A systematic review of multimodal machine learning models for heart failure classification and prognosis prediction

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a global medical condition marked by substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs with complex pathophysiology and variation in definitions. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach to improve HF classification and risk prediction by leveraging various data sources. This study aims to present the current state-of-the-art multimodal ML models for HF classification and prognosis prediction, focusing on their modalities, performance, and clinical utility. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420250654631), this review searched across four electronic databases (November 2014 - November 2024) and identified 284 unique records, of which 15 were included in the final synthesis. The quality of the studies was evaluated using QUADAS-2 and QUAPAS. Results: Our results showed that the two most common multimodal combinations were tabular-image and tabular-text. The algorithms of the models included convolutional neural networks for image data, transformer-based approaches for text, with well-known fused techniques (early, middle, late fusion). Overall, multimodal models demonstrated superior performance compared to unimodal approaches, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values frequently exceeding 80% and reaching as high as 98.2%. Conclusion: Despite promising results, challenges include inconsistent reporting of performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals, limited external validation, a near absence of prospective studies, and a deficiency in integrating genetic or 'omics' information with conventional data. These challenges must be addressed to promote clinical adoption and future research. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250654631, identifier CRD420250654631.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1770869
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of multimodal machine learning models for heart failure classification and prognosis prediction

Y L Chen, Manh Thang Hoang, Gregory Slabaugh, Nay Aung
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

A systematic review of multimodal machine learning models for heart failure classification and prognosis prediction

Y L Chen, Manh Thang Hoang, Gregory Slabaugh, Nay Aung
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a global medical condition marked by substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs with complex pathophysiology and variation in definitions. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising approach to improve HF classification and risk prediction by leveraging various data sources. This study aims to present the current state-of-the-art multimodal ML models for HF classification and prognosis prediction, focusing on their modalities, performance, and clinical utility. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420250654631), this review searched across four electronic databases (November 2014 - November 2024) and identified 284 unique records, of which 15 were included in the final synthesis. The quality of the studies was evaluated using QUADAS-2 and QUAPAS. Results: Our results showed that the two most common multimodal combinations were tabular-image and tabular-text. The algorithms of the models included convolutional neural networks for image data, transformer-based approaches for text, with well-known fused techniques (early, middle, late fusion). Overall, multimodal models demonstrated superior performance compared to unimodal approaches, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values frequently exceeding 80% and reaching as high as 98.2%. Conclusion: Despite promising results, challenges include inconsistent reporting of performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals, limited external validation, a near absence of prospective studies, and a deficiency in integrating genetic or 'omics' information with conventional data. These challenges must be addressed to promote clinical adoption and future research. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250654631, identifier CRD420250654631.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), William Harvey Research Institute (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.