Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Character of Violence: A Comparative Analysis of Security Dynamics in the United Kingdom and Africa

Abstract The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the modern system of security is gradually transforming and reshaping the nature of violence in the global contexts. Although AI is perceived as a technologically neutral innovation, the security of AI is highly contextualized by political, institutional, and regulatory contexts. This paper compares the intersection of AI with the dynamics of security in the United Kingdom and African states with a specific focus on defence, intelligence, policing, counterterrorism, and the overall system of governance. Based on theoretical arguments about remote warfare, algorithmic governance, surveillance-based security, and hybrid threats, the paper posits that AI alters the actor, means, and space of violence in a manner that looks beyond the traditional kinetic warfare. The analysis unveils that the United Kingdom introduces AI in relatively advanced technological systems and unified frameworks of regulations, which are supported by civilian governance and ethical control systems. By comparison, AI implementation in most African settings is realized in settings characterized by unequal institutional capacity, externality to technologies and less robust regulatory protection. Such disparities define contrasting security performances, even in the case of similar technologies used. Regardless of these distinctions, both scenarios are characterized by common weaknesses such as the problem of algorithmic bias, lack of accountability, and the decentralization of AI abilities to non-state actors. Nonetheless, the impacts of these risks are uneven, and the vulnerability of governance in most of the African contexts increases the possibility of abuse and authoritarianism supported by AI. The paper concludes that AI is not only a technical tool but a force-shifting technology the effects of which on violence depend on the context. The study therefore recommends increased equitable global AI governance as well as enhanced UK-Africa collaboration based on ethical principles, institutional capacity development, and context-specific security implementations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19589742
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Character of Violence: A Comparative Analysis of Security Dynamics in the United Kingdom and Africa

ISHOLA Akinwale Victor, Kelechi Adura, ANYA Anya Adebayo, Eke Kehinde ANYA ANYA
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Character of Violence: A Comparative Analysis of Security Dynamics in the United Kingdom and Africa

ISHOLA Akinwale Victor, Kelechi Adura, ANYA Anya Adebayo, Eke Kehinde ANYA ANYA
article en

Abstract

Abstract The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the modern system of security is gradually transforming and reshaping the nature of violence in the global contexts. Although AI is perceived as a technologically neutral innovation, the security of AI is highly contextualized by political, institutional, and regulatory contexts. This paper compares the intersection of AI with the dynamics of security in the United Kingdom and African states with a specific focus on defence, intelligence, policing, counterterrorism, and the overall system of governance. Based on theoretical arguments about remote warfare, algorithmic governance, surveillance-based security, and hybrid threats, the paper posits that AI alters the actor, means, and space of violence in a manner that looks beyond the traditional kinetic warfare. The analysis unveils that the United Kingdom introduces AI in relatively advanced technological systems and unified frameworks of regulations, which are supported by civilian governance and ethical control systems. By comparison, AI implementation in most African settings is realized in settings characterized by unequal institutional capacity, externality to technologies and less robust regulatory protection. Such disparities define contrasting security performances, even in the case of similar technologies used. Regardless of these distinctions, both scenarios are characterized by common weaknesses such as the problem of algorithmic bias, lack of accountability, and the decentralization of AI abilities to non-state actors. Nonetheless, the impacts of these risks are uneven, and the vulnerability of governance in most of the African contexts increases the possibility of abuse and authoritarianism supported by AI. The paper concludes that AI is not only a technical tool but a force-shifting technology the effects of which on violence depend on the context. The study therefore recommends increased equitable global AI governance as well as enhanced UK-Africa collaboration based on ethical principles, institutional capacity development, and context-specific security implementations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scottish Power (United Kingdom) (GB), Landmark University (NG), International Humanitarian University (UA), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.