The political economy of mandatory disclosure: a literature review

Reviewing the literature on mandatory corporate disclosure from a political economy perspective, we synthesize the classic justifications for disclosure regulations while emphasizing why voluntary disclosure often fails to achieve socially efficient transparency. We also highlight how legal institutions, enforcement capacity, and political forces shape the design, credibility, and effectiveness of disclosure mandates. Drawing on evidence from international and China-focused studies, we review empirical findings on how mandatory disclosure affects investor protection, information environments, and firm behavior, showing that similar reporting rules yield different outcomes across institutional settings. We further extend the discussion to ESG and climate-related disclosure to examine emerging evidence on transparency gains, real effects, compliance costs, and regulatory trade-offs, including debates on materiality and regulatory objectives. Overall, the literature suggests that mandatory disclosure remains a central governance instrument in modern capital markets, but its effectiveness depends on its enforcement, institutional context and political economy constraints.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
China Journal of Accounting Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2026.100486
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political economy of mandatory disclosure: a literature review

Hao Liang, Hanyu Zhang
China Journal of Accounting Research
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

The political economy of mandatory disclosure: a literature review

Hao Liang, Hanyu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Reviewing the literature on mandatory corporate disclosure from a political economy perspective, we synthesize the classic justifications for disclosure regulations while emphasizing why voluntary disclosure often fails to achieve socially efficient transparency. We also highlight how legal institutions, enforcement capacity, and political forces shape the design, credibility, and effectiveness of disclosure mandates. Drawing on evidence from international and China-focused studies, we review empirical findings on how mandatory disclosure affects investor protection, information environments, and firm behavior, showing that similar reporting rules yield different outcomes across institutional settings. We further extend the discussion to ESG and climate-related disclosure to examine emerging evidence on transparency gains, real effects, compliance costs, and regulatory trade-offs, including debates on materiality and regulatory objectives. Overall, the literature suggests that mandatory disclosure remains a central governance instrument in modern capital markets, but its effectiveness depends on its enforcement, institutional context and political economy constraints.

China Journal of Accounting ResearchVol. 19(2)
National University's Basic Research Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.