Position paper on the documentation of biologic therapies for severe asthma

Abstract Background Biologics are the first-line treatment for patients with severe, inadequately controlled asthma. They can lead to a significant reduction in (or even complete avoidance of) exacerbations, a reduction in the need for systemic glucocorticoids with their many side effects, and a marked improvement in asthma control and lung function in severe asthma. Due to the high annual costs of biologic therapy, there is legitimate interest among health insurances in guideline- and approval-compliant as well as cost-effective use of biologics in severe asthma. On the other hand, there is also legitimate interest among treating physicians in prescribing these biologics without risk of insurer repayment demands. Methodology Using an analysis of the literature and regulatory approvals, the evidence for treatment with currently approved biologics for severe asthma—omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and depemokimab— was documented, and supplemented by the clinical experiences of the authors. Results Based on the guideline recommendations and approvals, recommendations are made for the use of the aforementioned biologics in the German healthcare system. In a joint effort by various professional associations (AeDA, DGP, BdP, GAN, DGAKI, GPP, GPA), documentation forms were created for all biologics approved for severe asthma, which can serve as a basis for documentation. Forms were developed both for the initiation of biologic therapy and for the documentation of biologic treatment responses in severe asthma. Conclusion The new documentation forms concisely summarize all key points related to biologic prescription in severe asthma on a single page, serving both to ensure guideline-compliant and approval-compliant prescription and to avoid drug repayment demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Allergo Journal International
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-026-00368-w
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position paper on the documentation of biologic therapies for severe asthma

S. Lampert, Marek Lommatzsch, Marcus Joest, J Trischler et al.
Allergo Journal International
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Position paper on the documentation of biologic therapies for severe asthma

S. Lampert, Marek Lommatzsch, Marcus Joest, J Trischler, Christian Vogelberg, Kristin aufm Kampe, Randolf Brehler, C Taube, Norbert Mulleneisen, Eckard Hamelmann, Ludger Klimek, Roland Buhl, Stephanie Korn, Florian Schmitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Biologics are the first-line treatment for patients with severe, inadequately controlled asthma. They can lead to a significant reduction in (or even complete avoidance of) exacerbations, a reduction in the need for systemic glucocorticoids with their many side effects, and a marked improvement in asthma control and lung function in severe asthma. Due to the high annual costs of biologic therapy, there is legitimate interest among health insurances in guideline- and approval-compliant as well as cost-effective use of biologics in severe asthma. On the other hand, there is also legitimate interest among treating physicians in prescribing these biologics without risk of insurer repayment demands. Methodology Using an analysis of the literature and regulatory approvals, the evidence for treatment with currently approved biologics for severe asthma—omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and depemokimab— was documented, and supplemented by the clinical experiences of the authors. Results Based on the guideline recommendations and approvals, recommendations are made for the use of the aforementioned biologics in the German healthcare system. In a joint effort by various professional associations (AeDA, DGP, BdP, GAN, DGAKI, GPP, GPA), documentation forms were created for all biologics approved for severe asthma, which can serve as a basis for documentation. Forms were developed both for the initiation of biologic therapy and for the documentation of biologic treatment responses in severe asthma. Conclusion The new documentation forms concisely summarize all key points related to biologic prescription in severe asthma on a single page, serving both to ensure guideline-compliant and approval-compliant prescription and to avoid drug repayment demands.

Allergo Journal InternationalVol. 35(3)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Applied Sciences Mainz (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), University of Münster (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Ruhrlandklinik (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Research Center (US), University Hospital Münster (DE), Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld (DE), Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE), Klinikum Leverkusen (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), University of Rostock (DE), Bethel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.