Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children's use of technology: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Technology is integrated into many children's daily lives, with parents' and health professionals' perspectives shaping children's technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives is essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of questionnaires used to assess parents' and health professionals' perspectives on young children's use of technology related to health, wellbeing, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or healthcare professionals' perspectives on technology use among children aged birth-5 years. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and study quality assessment. Reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires were synthesised. Deductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesise the reported perspectives. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals' perspectives. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low with 62 studies scoring below the threshold for acceptable quality. Fifty-two studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used of which only 15 studies reported more than one measure of validity or reliability. Seventy-five studies reported participants' perspectives on children's technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children's physical health, emotions, and behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: Parents' perspectives on children's technology use were frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the validity of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognised, while countered with concerns about the impact on children's physical health and development. High-quality questionnaires are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology use decision-making with and for children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/84712
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children's use of technology: A systematic review.

Amber Beynon, Courtenay Harris, Kate Mannell, Juliana Zabatiero et al.
PubMed
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children's use of technology: A systematic review.

Amber Beynon, Courtenay Harris, Kate Mannell, Juliana Zabatiero, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Leon Straker, Danica Hendry, Lisa K. Kervin, Ivan Pui Hung Au, Susan Edwards, George Thomas, Sarah Stearne
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technology is integrated into many children's daily lives, with parents' and health professionals' perspectives shaping children's technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives is essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of questionnaires used to assess parents' and health professionals' perspectives on young children's use of technology related to health, wellbeing, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives. METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or healthcare professionals' perspectives on technology use among children aged birth-5 years. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and study quality assessment. Reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires were synthesised. Deductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesise the reported perspectives. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals' perspectives. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low with 62 studies scoring below the threshold for acceptable quality. Fifty-two studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used of which only 15 studies reported more than one measure of validity or reliability. Seventy-five studies reported participants' perspectives on children's technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children's physical health, emotions, and behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: Parents' perspectives on children's technology use were frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the validity of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognised, while countered with concerns about the impact on children's physical health and development. High-quality questionnaires are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology use decision-making with and for children.

PubMed
Deakin University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Curtin University (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.