Biological Sex Differences in the US-CTEPH-R

RATIONALE: Biological sex underpins phenotypic differences in many cardiopulmonary conditions. In pulmonary hypertension, most studies have focused on the 'sex paradox' in pulmonary arterial hypertension, where females are more susceptible to PAH but have better right ventricular function, better response to PAH medications, and better survival than males. Sex differences have also been observed in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but are less well characterized. OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate sex differences in males and females diagnosed with CTEPH in the United States. METHODS: Using the multicenter United States CTEPH Registry, we explored sex differences in a CTEPH population at baseline and follow-up. We collected data every six months for a total of 48 months. Sex was determined from self-reported "male", "female", or "transgender" categories recorded on case report forms. We report descriptive analyses comparing male and female characteristics. We examined prespecified variables of interest using regression modeling, including adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) and interaction terms (sex vs age, sex vs BMI). Survival analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Females (n = 367, 49.1%) had greater BMI than males (Median [IQR] F: 32 kg/m2 [26.6, 38.8] v. M: 28.7 kg/m2 [25.5, 33.8]). Males were more likely to have a recognized history of acute deep vein thrombosis (OR 2.6; CI 1.9-3.5). Males had better baseline PH-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by EmPHasis10 (-3.3; CI -5.0- (-1.7), World Health Organization functional class (FC III/IV OR 0.52, CI 0.37-0.74) and longer six-minute walk distance (+82.3 m, CI 56.4-108.2). Males were less likely to have distally located disease (OR 0.53, CI 0.35-0.78) and were less likely to have inoperable CTEPH (OR 0.62, CI 0.40-0.96). Post-PTE, females had persistently worse HRQoL and function, with increased need for adjunctive therapies. There was no difference in overall survival between males and females (HR 1.11; CI 0.71-1.75). CONCLUSION: Males and females may have distinct CTEPH phenotypes which impact access to and feasibility of PTE. There are sex-associated disparities in the experience of CTEPH as a disease state, and differential impacts on HRQoL that warrant further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag098
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological Sex Differences in the US-CTEPH-R

Feng He, Meghan M. Cirulis, SONIA JAIN, K Kerr et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Biological Sex Differences in the US-CTEPH-R

Feng He, Meghan M. Cirulis, SONIA JAIN, K Kerr, R Channick, V Tapson, William R. Auger, Corey E. Ventetuolo, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Kelly Chin, Raymond L. Benza, Valerie McLaughlin, Michael M Madani, R Duane Davis, C Greg Elliott
article en

Abstract

RATIONALE: Biological sex underpins phenotypic differences in many cardiopulmonary conditions. In pulmonary hypertension, most studies have focused on the 'sex paradox' in pulmonary arterial hypertension, where females are more susceptible to PAH but have better right ventricular function, better response to PAH medications, and better survival than males. Sex differences have also been observed in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but are less well characterized. OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate sex differences in males and females diagnosed with CTEPH in the United States. METHODS: Using the multicenter United States CTEPH Registry, we explored sex differences in a CTEPH population at baseline and follow-up. We collected data every six months for a total of 48 months. Sex was determined from self-reported "male", "female", or "transgender" categories recorded on case report forms. We report descriptive analyses comparing male and female characteristics. We examined prespecified variables of interest using regression modeling, including adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) and interaction terms (sex vs age, sex vs BMI). Survival analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Females (n = 367, 49.1%) had greater BMI than males (Median [IQR] F: 32 kg/m2 [26.6, 38.8] v. M: 28.7 kg/m2 [25.5, 33.8]). Males were more likely to have a recognized history of acute deep vein thrombosis (OR 2.6; CI 1.9-3.5). Males had better baseline PH-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by EmPHasis10 (-3.3; CI -5.0- (-1.7), World Health Organization functional class (FC III/IV OR 0.52, CI 0.37-0.74) and longer six-minute walk distance (+82.3 m, CI 56.4-108.2). Males were less likely to have distally located disease (OR 0.53, CI 0.35-0.78) and were less likely to have inoperable CTEPH (OR 0.62, CI 0.40-0.96). Post-PTE, females had persistently worse HRQoL and function, with increased need for adjunctive therapies. There was no difference in overall survival between males and females (HR 1.11; CI 0.71-1.75). CONCLUSION: Males and females may have distinct CTEPH phenotypes which impact access to and feasibility of PTE. There are sex-associated disparities in the experience of CTEPH as a disease state, and differential impacts on HRQoL that warrant further investigation.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.