Building bridges: Involvement of animal care staff and laboratory technicians in experimental planning and conduct of animal studies for better job satisfaction and science

The involvement of non-scientific staff in discussions about animal welfare and scientific quality is essential for biomedical research progress. In this study, we developed a survey to collect the self-perception of animal care staff (ACS) and laboratory technicians about their involvement in scientific planning and conduct. Participants were contacted to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. We obtained 850 responses, mainly from Europe: 564 from ACS and 286 from laboratory technicians. Job satisfaction was assessed as positive by ACS and laboratory technicians despite the low frequency of culture of care activities and mental health meetings. Both groups expressed their desire to be trained in research planning and conduct; however, regular training was not reported. In addition, the inability to act on animal welfare concerns owing to experimental reasons was reported by both groups. Over half of the participants felt valued and appreciated by the lead scientists or animal facility manager; however, it is not clear how they are acknowledged, as their names on the authors list or in the manuscript acknowledgments are barely included. Our results indicated that involvement of ACS and laboratory technicians in planning and conducting studies would improve their understanding of how experiments are done, and therefore communication processes, work satisfaction, animal welfare, and scientific quality. Finally, we provided recommendations to improve the engagement of ACS and laboratory technicians in discussions about animal research planning and conduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Animals
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251400976
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building bridges: Involvement of animal care staff and laboratory technicians in experimental planning and conduct of animal studies for better job satisfaction and science

A. J. Smith, Erdal Horata, Nuno Henrique Franco, Nadine Baumgart et al.
Laboratory Animals
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Building bridges: Involvement of animal care staff and laboratory technicians in experimental planning and conduct of animal studies for better job satisfaction and science

A. J. Smith, Erdal Horata, Nuno Henrique Franco, Nadine Baumgart, Winfried Neuhaus, Bettina Bert, Augusto Vitale, Jan Baumgart, Paulin Jirkof, Sophie Schober, Fernando Gonzalez-Uarquin, Ljupco Angelovski, Brígida Riso, Athanassia Sotiropoulos, Rohish Kaura, Özge S. Cevik, Penny Hawkins
article en

Abstract

The involvement of non-scientific staff in discussions about animal welfare and scientific quality is essential for biomedical research progress. In this study, we developed a survey to collect the self-perception of animal care staff (ACS) and laboratory technicians about their involvement in scientific planning and conduct. Participants were contacted to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. We obtained 850 responses, mainly from Europe: 564 from ACS and 286 from laboratory technicians. Job satisfaction was assessed as positive by ACS and laboratory technicians despite the low frequency of culture of care activities and mental health meetings. Both groups expressed their desire to be trained in research planning and conduct; however, regular training was not reported. In addition, the inability to act on animal welfare concerns owing to experimental reasons was reported by both groups. Over half of the participants felt valued and appreciated by the lead scientists or animal facility manager; however, it is not clear how they are acknowledged, as their names on the authors list or in the manuscript acknowledgments are barely included. Our results indicated that involvement of ACS and laboratory technicians in planning and conducting studies would improve their understanding of how experiments are done, and therefore communication processes, work satisfaction, animal welfare, and scientific quality. Finally, we provided recommendations to improve the engagement of ACS and laboratory technicians in discussions about animal research planning and conduct.

Laboratory Animals
Danube Private University (AT), AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), University of Lisbon (PT), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Bipar (FR), Universidad CES (CO), Agence Nationale des Fréquences (FR), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NO), Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Mersin Üniversitesi (TR), Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK), Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.