The decomposition of beta diversity reveals the difference between crustacean and rotifer communities in response to environmental change in tropical reservoirs

Crustaceans and rotifers are key components of freshwater ecosystems, exhibiting distinct life-history strategies and functional traits. However, these two groups are often integrated into a single assemblage in analysis of zooplankton communities, potentially obscuring the mechanisms underlying community variation. As a key measure of community variation, beta diversity (β-diversity) and its decomposition provide critical insights into the processes shaping community structure. We compared β-diversity patterns of crustaceans and rotifers across 21 tropical reservoirs within a large river basin, applying two complementary decomposition frameworks. Crustacean β-diversity showed higher nestedness and lower turnover components than that of rotifers. Both Mantel tests and Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling (GDM) revealed that crustacean community variation was jointly influenced by environmental filtering—primarily total phosphorus concentration and rotifer abundance—and weak dispersal limitation associated with spatial distance. In contrast, rotifer communities were mainly shaped by environmental filtering. Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD) further indicated spatial asynchrony between crustaceans and rotifers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed differences in food resource preferences between the two groups: crustaceans responded strongly to cryptophyte biomass, whereas rotifers were more associated with cyanobacterial biomass. Our findings suggest that contrasting functional traits and feeding strategies lead to distinct β-diversity patterns and environmental responses between crustaceans and rotifers. These results underscore the importance of analyzing these groups separately to improve ecological monitoring, biodiversity assessment, and the understanding of community assembly mechanisms. • The study reveals significant differences in β-diversity composition between crustaceans and rotifers. • Environmental filtering and dispersal limitation jointly drive variation in crustacean communities, whereas rotifer communities are mainly shaped by environmental filtering. • Differences in food resource preferences may lead to the spatial asynchrony of the LCBDs between crustaceans and rotifers. • These findings highlight the crustaceans and rotifers must be analyzed separately to ensure accurate freshwater ecosystem assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114864
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The decomposition of beta diversity reveals the difference between crustacean and rotifer communities in response to environmental change in tropical reservoirs

Zhixin Wang, Qi Huang, Bo-Ping Han, Yanan Zhang et al.
Ecological Indicators
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
article

The decomposition of beta diversity reveals the difference between crustacean and rotifer communities in response to environmental change in tropical reservoirs

Zhixin Wang, Qi Huang, Bo-Ping Han, Yanan Zhang, Jiayi Li
article en

Abstract

Crustaceans and rotifers are key components of freshwater ecosystems, exhibiting distinct life-history strategies and functional traits. However, these two groups are often integrated into a single assemblage in analysis of zooplankton communities, potentially obscuring the mechanisms underlying community variation. As a key measure of community variation, beta diversity (β-diversity) and its decomposition provide critical insights into the processes shaping community structure. We compared β-diversity patterns of crustaceans and rotifers across 21 tropical reservoirs within a large river basin, applying two complementary decomposition frameworks. Crustacean β-diversity showed higher nestedness and lower turnover components than that of rotifers. Both Mantel tests and Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling (GDM) revealed that crustacean community variation was jointly influenced by environmental filtering—primarily total phosphorus concentration and rotifer abundance—and weak dispersal limitation associated with spatial distance. In contrast, rotifer communities were mainly shaped by environmental filtering. Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD) further indicated spatial asynchrony between crustaceans and rotifers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed differences in food resource preferences between the two groups: crustaceans responded strongly to cryptophyte biomass, whereas rotifers were more associated with cyanobacterial biomass. Our findings suggest that contrasting functional traits and feeding strategies lead to distinct β-diversity patterns and environmental responses between crustaceans and rotifers. These results underscore the importance of analyzing these groups separately to improve ecological monitoring, biodiversity assessment, and the understanding of community assembly mechanisms. • The study reveals significant differences in β-diversity composition between crustaceans and rotifers. • Environmental filtering and dispersal limitation jointly drive variation in crustacean communities, whereas rotifer communities are mainly shaped by environmental filtering. • Differences in food resource preferences may lead to the spatial asynchrony of the LCBDs between crustaceans and rotifers. • These findings highlight the crustaceans and rotifers must be analyzed separately to ensure accurate freshwater ecosystem assessments.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 186
Jinan University (CN), Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.