The status of cell and gene therapy education in medical schools—An international survey

INTRODUCTION: Cell and gene therapy (CGT) has emerged as a distinct medical field with more than 50 "Food and Drug Administration (FDA)"-approved products treating conditions from leukemia to sickle cell disease. Despite this therapeutic revolution and the field's inherent complexity, the status of CGT education in medical schools remains unknown. STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS: This study explores the current state of CGT education in medical school curricula internationally and evaluates educators' perspectives on training adequacy and curriculum development needs. An international survey of 504 medical schools across six continents was conducted between September 2023 and April 2024. The 20-question poll assessed institutional characteristics, CGT educational requirements and structure, faculty resources, curriculum content, and educator perspectives. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all responses. RESULTS: Forty-six medical schools from 21 countries responded (9.1% response rate). Only 41% (19/46) offered CGT education, predominantly as optional courses (53%) during third and fourth years. Most programs relied on 2-4 faculty with competing responsibilities; only two institutions had dedicated CGT educators. Three schools reported standardized curricula, and none formally assessed student learning. Most educators (56%) considered current CGT education inadequate, and 78% advocated expansion. Nearly two-thirds (64%) agreed to integrate professionally developed online CGT courses. CONCLUSION: Medical education lags substantially behind the clinical adoption of CGT. The gap threatens future physicians' ability to offer optimal care. Strong educator consensus on inadequacy and interest in standardized resources signals an opportunity for intervention through collaborative curriculum initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfusion
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70226
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The status of cell and gene therapy education in medical schools—An international survey

Elena Nedelcu, Alexandra M. Tabacu, Edina A. Wappler‐Guzzetta
Transfusion
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

The status of cell and gene therapy education in medical schools—An international survey

Elena Nedelcu, Alexandra M. Tabacu, Edina A. Wappler‐Guzzetta
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cell and gene therapy (CGT) has emerged as a distinct medical field with more than 50 "Food and Drug Administration (FDA)"-approved products treating conditions from leukemia to sickle cell disease. Despite this therapeutic revolution and the field's inherent complexity, the status of CGT education in medical schools remains unknown. STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS: This study explores the current state of CGT education in medical school curricula internationally and evaluates educators' perspectives on training adequacy and curriculum development needs. An international survey of 504 medical schools across six continents was conducted between September 2023 and April 2024. The 20-question poll assessed institutional characteristics, CGT educational requirements and structure, faculty resources, curriculum content, and educator perspectives. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all responses. RESULTS: Forty-six medical schools from 21 countries responded (9.1% response rate). Only 41% (19/46) offered CGT education, predominantly as optional courses (53%) during third and fourth years. Most programs relied on 2-4 faculty with competing responsibilities; only two institutions had dedicated CGT educators. Three schools reported standardized curricula, and none formally assessed student learning. Most educators (56%) considered current CGT education inadequate, and 78% advocated expansion. Nearly two-thirds (64%) agreed to integrate professionally developed online CGT courses. CONCLUSION: Medical education lags substantially behind the clinical adoption of CGT. The gap threatens future physicians' ability to offer optimal care. Strong educator consensus on inadequacy and interest in standardized resources signals an opportunity for intervention through collaborative curriculum initiatives.

Transfusion
Boston Medical Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The status of cell and gene therapy education in medical schools—An international survey — Elena Nedelcu, Alexandra M. Tabacu, et al. · Transfusion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS