Consensus‐Based Safety Recommendations for Informal Home Care: A Mixed Methods Study

As home-based care expands globally, informal caregivers are responsible for medical and nursing responsibilities, raising serious concerns about safety and risk management. This study proposes expert-informed, safety recommendations tailored to informal caregiving in home settings. The study used a six-phase mixed methods design combining a Consensus Development Conference (CDC) process with elements of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In the first five phases, 13 healthcare professionals, hereafter referred to as "the professionals" (10 nurses, one physician, one occupational therapist, and one social worker), engaged in deliberations and risk assessments. The professionals agreed on 15 caregiving domains such as medication administration, mobility, and caregiver well-being, mapped them to 53 home caregiving procedures, identified 160 potential failure modes (errors), and rated the effect severity of each failure mode. This process led to the development of an initial set of 450 safety recommendations. In the final phase, a multidisciplinary expert review conducted by the research team merged overlapping items, eliminating redundancies and ensuring accuracy, confirming 53 procedures, 147 distinct failure modes (errors), refining 213 procedure failure mode effect associations, and consolidating the corpus to 288 recommendations. The resulting recommendations are intended to guide the development of safety guidance for informal caregiving in home settings. These recommendations are considered expert-derived guidance, since end users did not participate in the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Nursing & Health
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70074
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus‐Based Safety Recommendations for Informal Home Care: A Mixed Methods Study

José Joaquín Mira, Mercedes Guilabert, Reinhard Strametz, Valerie Matarredona et al.
Research in Nursing & Health
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Consensus‐Based Safety Recommendations for Informal Home Care: A Mixed Methods Study

José Joaquín Mira, Mercedes Guilabert, Reinhard Strametz, Valerie Matarredona, Bojana Knežević, Daniel Monasor Ortola, Nida Abed, Vanessa Riberio Neves, Paulo Sousa, Virginia Ferrer García
article en

Abstract

As home-based care expands globally, informal caregivers are responsible for medical and nursing responsibilities, raising serious concerns about safety and risk management. This study proposes expert-informed, safety recommendations tailored to informal caregiving in home settings. The study used a six-phase mixed methods design combining a Consensus Development Conference (CDC) process with elements of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In the first five phases, 13 healthcare professionals, hereafter referred to as "the professionals" (10 nurses, one physician, one occupational therapist, and one social worker), engaged in deliberations and risk assessments. The professionals agreed on 15 caregiving domains such as medication administration, mobility, and caregiver well-being, mapped them to 53 home caregiving procedures, identified 160 potential failure modes (errors), and rated the effect severity of each failure mode. This process led to the development of an initial set of 450 safety recommendations. In the final phase, a multidisciplinary expert review conducted by the research team merged overlapping items, eliminating redundancies and ensuring accuracy, confirming 53 procedures, 147 distinct failure modes (errors), refining 213 procedure failure mode effect associations, and consolidating the corpus to 288 recommendations. The resulting recommendations are intended to guide the development of safety guidance for informal caregiving in home settings. These recommendations are considered expert-derived guidance, since end users did not participate in the study.

Research in Nursing & Health
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), University of Alicante (ES), University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan D'Alacant (ES), National School of Public Health (GR), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT), RheinMain University of Applied Sciences (DE), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.