Software Taxation: The Impossible Act of Catching a Shadow

The taxation of software has long challenged tax systems, exacerbated by the rise of software-as-a-service (SaaS), cloud computing, automated digital services and the like. As software increasingly operates without transfer, download or ownership, traditional distinctions between goods, services and intangibles are becoming inadequate. This article explores why taxing software remains an exercise in “catching a shadow”, with particular focus on the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT.The decision reaffirmed that payments for software constitute royalty only where there is a transfer of copyright, and not where users merely obtain restricted rights to use software under an end-user licence. The article analyses how this principle was applied to conventional software distribution models and then examines its limits when confronted with modern digital business models. While Engineering Analysis provides important guidance, the taxation of digital-economy software transactions remains unsettled and highly fact-dependent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific tax bulletin
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59403/11208z
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Software Taxation: The Impossible Act of Catching a Shadow

Saurav Bhattacharya
Asia-Pacific tax bulletin
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Software Taxation: The Impossible Act of Catching a Shadow

Saurav Bhattacharya
article en

Abstract

The taxation of software has long challenged tax systems, exacerbated by the rise of software-as-a-service (SaaS), cloud computing, automated digital services and the like. As software increasingly operates without transfer, download or ownership, traditional distinctions between goods, services and intangibles are becoming inadequate. This article explores why taxing software remains an exercise in “catching a shadow”, with particular focus on the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT.The decision reaffirmed that payments for software constitute royalty only where there is a transfer of copyright, and not where users merely obtain restricted rights to use software under an end-user licence. The article analyses how this principle was applied to conventional software distribution models and then examines its limits when confronted with modern digital business models. While Engineering Analysis provides important guidance, the taxation of digital-economy software transactions remains unsettled and highly fact-dependent.

Asia-Pacific tax bulletinVol. 32(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.