Restrictive versus standard intravenous fluid therapy and NTproBNP in ICU patients with septic shock – a sub-study of the randomised CLASSIC trial

Cardiac dysfunction is common in septic shock and may be influenced by intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. We aimed to investigate the effects of restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy on plasma N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), a marker of cardiac dysfunction, in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This prospective exploratory sub-study of the randomised CLASSIC trial enrolled adult ICU patients with septic shock at one Danish and one Swedish ICU between February 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomised to restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy. Plasma NTproBNP was measured at randomisation (T0), the following morning (T1), the morning after (T2), and at ICU discharge or day 90 (T3). The exploratory outcome was the between-group difference in NTproBNP across timepoints assessed using mixed models. Fifty-four patients were included. NTproBNP levels did not differ significantly between groups at any timepoint. At T1, mean NTproBNP levels were 7667 ng/L in the restrictive group and 8913 ng/L in the standard group, with an estimated between-group difference of -1245 (95% CI -4065–1575). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were observed at T2 and T3. No group-by-time interaction was observed (p = 0.925). No statistically significant difference in plasma NTproBNP between adult ICU patients with septic shock randomised to restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy was seen. Uniformly elevated levels could suggest that NTproBNP in septic shock primarily reflects systemic inflammation rather than fluid-induced cardiac loading. Results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04282252. Registered 31 January 2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03836-6
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restrictive versus standard intravenous fluid therapy and NTproBNP in ICU patients with septic shock – a sub-study of the randomised CLASSIC trial

M H Møller, Fredric Sjöberg, Hans Järnbert‐Pettersson, Anna Håkansson Gladh et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Restrictive versus standard intravenous fluid therapy and NTproBNP in ICU patients with septic shock – a sub-study of the randomised CLASSIC trial

M H Møller, Fredric Sjöberg, Hans Järnbert‐Pettersson, Anna Håkansson Gladh, Peter Buhl Hjortrup, Tine Sylvest Meyhoff, Sandra Jonmarker, Praleene Sivapalan, Theis Lange, Maria Cronhjort, Eva Joelsson‐Alm, Jens Christensen, Johan Mårtensson, Anders Perner
article en

Abstract

Cardiac dysfunction is common in septic shock and may be influenced by intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. We aimed to investigate the effects of restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy on plasma N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), a marker of cardiac dysfunction, in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This prospective exploratory sub-study of the randomised CLASSIC trial enrolled adult ICU patients with septic shock at one Danish and one Swedish ICU between February 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomised to restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy. Plasma NTproBNP was measured at randomisation (T0), the following morning (T1), the morning after (T2), and at ICU discharge or day 90 (T3). The exploratory outcome was the between-group difference in NTproBNP across timepoints assessed using mixed models. Fifty-four patients were included. NTproBNP levels did not differ significantly between groups at any timepoint. At T1, mean NTproBNP levels were 7667 ng/L in the restrictive group and 8913 ng/L in the standard group, with an estimated between-group difference of -1245 (95% CI -4065–1575). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were observed at T2 and T3. No group-by-time interaction was observed (p = 0.925). No statistically significant difference in plasma NTproBNP between adult ICU patients with septic shock randomised to restrictive versus standard IV fluid therapy was seen. Uniformly elevated levels could suggest that NTproBNP in septic shock primarily reflects systemic inflammation rather than fluid-induced cardiac loading. Results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04282252. Registered 31 January 2020.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Danderyds sjukhus (SE), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Svenska Läkaresällskapet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.