Impact of Embolization on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Metameric and Sporadic Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: An Analysis of 216 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal arteriovenous metameric syndrome (SAMS) is a rare, complex vascular disorder characterized by multifocal spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (SCAVMs) affecting structures derived from the same metameric segment. The long-term clinical outcome of SAMS, particularly after embolization, remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of embolization for SAMS compared with nonmetameric SCAVMs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 216 patients with intradural SCAVMs who underwent embolization (62 patients with SAMS and 154 patients without metameric background [non-SAMS group]). Clinical and imaging data were reviewed to assess clinical worsening, hemorrhagic events, and angiographic worsening during the observation period after initial embolization. RESULTS: The overall median observation period was 44 months (IQR, 1-307). The SAMS group was associated with a higher risk of clinical and angiographic worsening compared with the non-SAMS group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90; 95% CI 1.37-6.12; P = .0003, and HR 5.04; 95% CI 2.03-12.50; P = .0001). Regarding hemorrhagic events, the SAMS group demonstrated a risk equivalent to the non-SAMS group (HR 1.93; 95% CI 0.65-5.78; P = .234). In subgroup analysis based on final occlusion rate (≥75% or <75%) of intradural SCAVMs, failure to achieve ≥75% occlusion in the SAMS group resulted in significantly worse clinical and angiographic outcomes (HR 5.28; 95% CI 1.90-14.66; P = .001, and HR 9.41; 95% CI 3.02-29.34; P = .0001). Achieving ≥75% occlusion resulted in a risk comparable with that of the non-SAMS group. CONCLUSION: Embolization reduced the risk of hemorrhagic events in SAMS to a level comparable with the non-SAMS group. However, SAMS carries a higher risk of clinical and angiographic worsening than non-SAMS, even after embolization. Achieving sufficient occlusion (≥75% occlusion) of intradural SCAVMs mitigates these clinical risks in SAMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000004028
Primary Topic
Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Embolization on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Metameric and Sporadic Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: An Analysis of 216 Patients

Alessandro Sgreccia, Georges Rodesch, Silvia Pizzuto, Federico Di Maria et al.
Neurosurgery
Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Impact of Embolization on Clinical Outcomes After Treatment of Metameric and Sporadic Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: An Analysis of 216 Patients

Alessandro Sgreccia, Georges Rodesch, Silvia Pizzuto, Federico Di Maria, Bikei Ryu, Stanislas Smajda, Arturo Consoli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal arteriovenous metameric syndrome (SAMS) is a rare, complex vascular disorder characterized by multifocal spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (SCAVMs) affecting structures derived from the same metameric segment. The long-term clinical outcome of SAMS, particularly after embolization, remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of embolization for SAMS compared with nonmetameric SCAVMs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 216 patients with intradural SCAVMs who underwent embolization (62 patients with SAMS and 154 patients without metameric background [non-SAMS group]). Clinical and imaging data were reviewed to assess clinical worsening, hemorrhagic events, and angiographic worsening during the observation period after initial embolization. RESULTS: The overall median observation period was 44 months (IQR, 1-307). The SAMS group was associated with a higher risk of clinical and angiographic worsening compared with the non-SAMS group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90; 95% CI 1.37-6.12; P = .0003, and HR 5.04; 95% CI 2.03-12.50; P = .0001). Regarding hemorrhagic events, the SAMS group demonstrated a risk equivalent to the non-SAMS group (HR 1.93; 95% CI 0.65-5.78; P = .234). In subgroup analysis based on final occlusion rate (≥75% or <75%) of intradural SCAVMs, failure to achieve ≥75% occlusion in the SAMS group resulted in significantly worse clinical and angiographic outcomes (HR 5.28; 95% CI 1.90-14.66; P = .001, and HR 9.41; 95% CI 3.02-29.34; P = .0001). Achieving ≥75% occlusion resulted in a risk comparable with that of the non-SAMS group. CONCLUSION: Embolization reduced the risk of hemorrhagic events in SAMS to a level comparable with the non-SAMS group. However, SAMS carries a higher risk of clinical and angiographic worsening than non-SAMS, even after embolization. Achieving sufficient occlusion (≥75% occlusion) of intradural SCAVMs mitigates these clinical risks in SAMS.

Neurosurgery
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), St. Luke's International Hospital (JP), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP), Hôpital Foch (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.