A Pilot Study of a Youth Gardening Retrospective Survey Tool: Evaluating Outcomes of School-Based, Garden-Enhanced Nutrition Education Programs

Farm-to-school initiatives, including school gardens, are an increasingly popular strategy to increase student access to healthy produce and nutrition education opportunities. While studies show school garden programs and garden-enhanced nutrition education can positively impact student consumption of fruits and vegetables, there is a gap in evaluation tools that can be used by practitioners across varied school sites, grades, and communities, to assess outcomes of their garden programs. This effort piloted the Student Garden Retrospective Survey (SGR) for grades 4+ in four classrooms in two counties in California. The instrument included items to measure program exposure, garden skill experiences, changes in students’ behaviors, preferences, and attitudes, as well as their perceptions of the program. Student and teacher feedback on the evaluation tool was gathered to determine if students understood the questions being asked, were able to complete the survey, and whether the evaluation questions were pertinent to their school gardening experiences. The results demonstrate that the SGR is suitable for evaluating school garden and garden-enhanced nutrition education programming. In the future, the evaluation tool can be used by practitioners to iteratively improve garden-based education to enhance students’ nutrition and health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/future4020014
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pilot Study of a Youth Gardening Retrospective Survey Tool: Evaluating Outcomes of School-Based, Garden-Enhanced Nutrition Education Programs

Katherine Soule, Noah Cooke, Cailin McLaughlin, Abbi Marrs et al.
Future
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

A Pilot Study of a Youth Gardening Retrospective Survey Tool: Evaluating Outcomes of School-Based, Garden-Enhanced Nutrition Education Programs

Katherine Soule, Noah Cooke, Cailin McLaughlin, Abbi Marrs, Angie J. Keihner, Barbara L. MkNelly
article en

Abstract

Farm-to-school initiatives, including school gardens, are an increasingly popular strategy to increase student access to healthy produce and nutrition education opportunities. While studies show school garden programs and garden-enhanced nutrition education can positively impact student consumption of fruits and vegetables, there is a gap in evaluation tools that can be used by practitioners across varied school sites, grades, and communities, to assess outcomes of their garden programs. This effort piloted the Student Garden Retrospective Survey (SGR) for grades 4+ in four classrooms in two counties in California. The instrument included items to measure program exposure, garden skill experiences, changes in students’ behaviors, preferences, and attitudes, as well as their perceptions of the program. Student and teacher feedback on the evaluation tool was gathered to determine if students understood the questions being asked, were able to complete the survey, and whether the evaluation questions were pertinent to their school gardening experiences. The results demonstrate that the SGR is suitable for evaluating school garden and garden-enhanced nutrition education programming. In the future, the evaluation tool can be used by practitioners to iteratively improve garden-based education to enhance students’ nutrition and health outcomes.

FutureVol. 4(2)
California State University System (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Sierra Club (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.