Characterising public opinion for food-based fiscal policies in the UK

Various fiscal policies have been proposed to incentivise healthy and sustainable diets, with differing attributes and levels. Public support can influence the ability for such policies to be implemented but is currently poorly understood, so two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were used to measure such preferences among 2020 adults in the UK. The attributes and levels for 192 policy options were identified using a scoping review that comprehensively documented existing or proposed food-based fiscal policies. For health-related taxes and subsidies, options that prioritised protecting the NHS budget were most preferred for all respondents, which held across variation in 9 respondent characteristics. For sustainability taxes, avoiding donating to other countries was a clear priority for all respondents, and again held across 9 respondent characteristics. These results could help to shape UK policy while these methods could be used to understand policy preferences elsewhere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119269
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterising public opinion for food-based fiscal policies in the UK

Hannah Forde, Henning Tarp Jensen, Asha Kaur, John Buckell et al.
Social Science & Medicine
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

Characterising public opinion for food-based fiscal policies in the UK

Hannah Forde, Henning Tarp Jensen, Asha Kaur, John Buckell, Ben Amies‐Cull, Marcus Keogh-Brown, Jessica Renzella, Laura Cornelsen, Lauren Bandy, Thomas O. Hancock, Sian Taylor, Margarida Bica, Mike Rayner, Peter Scarborough, Richard Smith, Owen Thomas, Jane Ward
article en

Abstract

Various fiscal policies have been proposed to incentivise healthy and sustainable diets, with differing attributes and levels. Public support can influence the ability for such policies to be implemented but is currently poorly understood, so two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were used to measure such preferences among 2020 adults in the UK. The attributes and levels for 192 policy options were identified using a scoping review that comprehensively documented existing or proposed food-based fiscal policies. For health-related taxes and subsidies, options that prioritised protecting the NHS budget were most preferred for all respondents, which held across variation in 9 respondent characteristics. For sustainability taxes, avoiding donating to other countries was a clear priority for all respondents, and again held across 9 respondent characteristics. These results could help to shape UK policy while these methods could be used to understand policy preferences elsewhere.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 401
University of Exeter (GB), Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (GB), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Nuffield Health (GB), Primary Health Care (QA), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Economic and Social Research Council, Public Health Research Programme, School for Public Health Research, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.