Aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract under mechanical ventilation: impact of nebulizer technology and ventilation mode

Aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated patients is common in intensive care units but lacks standardized practices and clinical evidence. Aerosol deposition depends on nebulizer type, ventilation mode, circuit position, and patient characteristics. This study examined how ventilation mode and nebulization technology affect regional aerosol deposition using a validated ex vivo porcine model. Four experimental conditions compared two nebulization technologies - vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and jet nebulizer (JN) - during two ventilation modes: spontaneous ventilation with pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation. Radiolabeled tracer ( 99m Tc-DTPA) quantified regional aerosol deposition throughout the ventilator circuit and respiratory tract via scintigraphic imaging. Each experiment was repeated three times using different porcine airways ventilated in a hypobaric chamber. Particle size analysis determined Mean Mass Aerosol Diameter (MMAD) and Geometric Standard Deviation. VMN produced significantly higher nebulized fractions (97-98%) versus JN (30-32%). Pulmonary deposition was consistently higher with VMN: 47% versus 9% for JN during spontaneous ventilation, and 57% versus 13% during volume-controlled ventilation. Nebulization technology affected deposition more than ventilation mode. Central-to-total lung deposition ratio was higher for VMN in volume-controlled mode. VMN produced larger particles (MMAD 4.6 μm) than JN (MMAD 3.7 μm) with similar dispersion profiles. This regional deposition comparison study demonstrates VMN significantly increased lung deposition up to fivefold, primarily through lower residual doses and higher aerosol output. No significant difference existed between ventilation modes, though volume-controlled ventilation trended higher. Results strongly support using VMN over JN in intensive care units as the key factor for optimizing aerosol delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108315
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract under mechanical ventilation: impact of nebulizer technology and ventilation mode

Emmanuel Odouard, Jérémie Pourchez, Lara Leclerc, Yoann Montigaud et al.
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract under mechanical ventilation: impact of nebulizer technology and ventilation mode

Emmanuel Odouard, Jérémie Pourchez, Lara Leclerc, Yoann Montigaud, Sophie Perinel, Nathalie Prévôt, Jordan Bonsignore, Arthur Rejeaunier
article en

Abstract

Aerosol therapy in mechanically ventilated patients is common in intensive care units but lacks standardized practices and clinical evidence. Aerosol deposition depends on nebulizer type, ventilation mode, circuit position, and patient characteristics. This study examined how ventilation mode and nebulization technology affect regional aerosol deposition using a validated ex vivo porcine model. Four experimental conditions compared two nebulization technologies - vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and jet nebulizer (JN) - during two ventilation modes: spontaneous ventilation with pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation. Radiolabeled tracer ( 99m Tc-DTPA) quantified regional aerosol deposition throughout the ventilator circuit and respiratory tract via scintigraphic imaging. Each experiment was repeated three times using different porcine airways ventilated in a hypobaric chamber. Particle size analysis determined Mean Mass Aerosol Diameter (MMAD) and Geometric Standard Deviation. VMN produced significantly higher nebulized fractions (97-98%) versus JN (30-32%). Pulmonary deposition was consistently higher with VMN: 47% versus 9% for JN during spontaneous ventilation, and 57% versus 13% during volume-controlled ventilation. Nebulization technology affected deposition more than ventilation mode. Central-to-total lung deposition ratio was higher for VMN in volume-controlled mode. VMN produced larger particles (MMAD 4.6 μm) than JN (MMAD 3.7 μm) with similar dispersion profiles. This regional deposition comparison study demonstrates VMN significantly increased lung deposition up to fivefold, primarily through lower residual doses and higher aerosol output. No significant difference existed between ventilation modes, though volume-controlled ventilation trended higher. Results strongly support using VMN over JN in intensive care units as the key factor for optimizing aerosol delivery.

Journal of Drug Delivery Science and TechnologyVol. 121
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Mines Saint-Étienne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.