Physical Activity and the Risk of Aortic Dissection: Results from the UK Biobank

We investigated the association between physical activity and the risk of aortic dissection in the UK Biobank. The analytical dataset included 452,994 participants aged mainly between 40 and 69 years, recruited from 2006 to 2010. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between physical activity and the risk of aortic dissection. During 12.3 years follow-up, 331 aortic dissection cases were identified. No clear association was observed between the highest vs. lowest quintile of frequency of leisure-time physical activity (HR, 95% CIs: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.59–1.19; Ptrend = 0.88), moderate physical activity (1.11, 0.71–1.72, Ptrend = 0.51), or vigorous physical activity (1.06, 0.76–1.48, Ptrend = 0.74) and risk of aortic dissection. A suggestive inverse U-shaped association was observed for moderate vs. low levels of walking and aortic dissection risk with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.00 (reference), 0.80 (0.53–1.20), 0.63 (0.41–0.97), 0.63 (0.39–1.02) and 0.78 (0.55–1.11) for walking 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 times/week, respectively. This association was slightly strengthened after exclusion of participants with prevalent CVD, cancer and respiratory disease at baseline. In analyses using MET-hours/week as the metric, a suggestive inverse association was observed for vigorous physical activity (0.66, 0.43–0.99; Ptrend = 0.09), but not for other physical activity domains. Overall, we found little evidence of a clear association between physical activity and aortic dissection in the current study. Potential U-shaped inverse associations between frequency of walking and the risk of aortic dissection, and between MET-hours/week of vigorous physical activity and aortic dissection need further study in additional large cohort studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-026-00380-0
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Activity and the Risk of Aortic Dissection: Results from the UK Biobank

Dagfinn Aune, Alison Dillman, M.R. Sánchez-Pérez, Makoto Hibino et al.
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Physical Activity and the Risk of Aortic Dissection: Results from the UK Biobank

Dagfinn Aune, Alison Dillman, M.R. Sánchez-Pérez, Makoto Hibino, Momina Khan
article en

Abstract

We investigated the association between physical activity and the risk of aortic dissection in the UK Biobank. The analytical dataset included 452,994 participants aged mainly between 40 and 69 years, recruited from 2006 to 2010. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between physical activity and the risk of aortic dissection. During 12.3 years follow-up, 331 aortic dissection cases were identified. No clear association was observed between the highest vs. lowest quintile of frequency of leisure-time physical activity (HR, 95% CIs: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.59–1.19; Ptrend = 0.88), moderate physical activity (1.11, 0.71–1.72, Ptrend = 0.51), or vigorous physical activity (1.06, 0.76–1.48, Ptrend = 0.74) and risk of aortic dissection. A suggestive inverse U-shaped association was observed for moderate vs. low levels of walking and aortic dissection risk with HRs (95% CIs) of 1.00 (reference), 0.80 (0.53–1.20), 0.63 (0.41–0.97), 0.63 (0.39–1.02) and 0.78 (0.55–1.11) for walking 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 times/week, respectively. This association was slightly strengthened after exclusion of participants with prevalent CVD, cancer and respiratory disease at baseline. In analyses using MET-hours/week as the metric, a suggestive inverse association was observed for vigorous physical activity (0.66, 0.43–0.99; Ptrend = 0.09), but not for other physical activity domains. Overall, we found little evidence of a clear association between physical activity and aortic dissection in the current study. Potential U-shaped inverse associations between frequency of walking and the risk of aortic dissection, and between MET-hours/week of vigorous physical activity and aortic dissection need further study in additional large cohort studies.

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
Cleveland Clinic (US), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), Imperial College London (GB)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.