Biosignatures of cognitive basic symptoms mark a distinct neurodevelopmental pathway to schizophrenia.

Efforts to predict schizophrenia risk using biological data have been hampered by the heterogeneity of current "clinical-high-risk" (CHR-P) criteria, which pool phenomenologically and biologically distinct syndromes under a single label. In particular, the field has focused almost exclusively on ultra-high-risk (UHR) symptoms, while cognitive basic symptoms (COGDIS)-despite their close alignment with schizophrenia's core features such as formal thought disorder-have remained underutilised. To date, no study has directly compared brain signatures of different CHR-P definitions with respect to their similarity to schizophrenia and their diagnostic, biopsychosocial, and prognostic profiles. We applied machine learning to structural MRI data from 1,425 patients (CHR-P subgroups, recent-onset psychosis, depression) and 907 healthy controls to derive and compare diagnostic brain signatures for Cognitive Disturbances (COGDIS), Ultra-High-Risk (UHR), their overlap (MIXED), and schizophrenia. The MIXED and UHR signatures lacked diagnostic separability and similarity with schizophrenia. Contrarily, the COGDIS signature distinguished patients from controls (BAC=69%, P < .001) and aligned with the schizophrenia signature (r = 0.60), involving shared fronto-parieto-perisylvian volume reductions. UHR was characterised by volume enlargements, whereas MIXED exhibited a mixed pattern of reductions and enlargements relative to healthy controls. COGDIS and schizophrenia signature expressions were predictable with 12%-21% variance explained based on polygenic, cognitive, and exposomal factors both in a transdiagnostic patient cohort and in healthy controls. Their expressions increased from health to schizophrenia. MIXED signature expression was also predictable from biopsychosocial data, but with higher explained variance in patient samples (21%) than in healthy controls (3%). UHR signature expression showed no significant biopsychosocial predictability in either group. Cell-enriched polygenic risk profiles differed across signatures, with COGDIS and schizophrenia showing enrichment patterns implicated in neurodevelopmental processes, while MIXED being associated with immune- and blood-brain-barrier-related enrichments. Longitudinally, COGDIS and schizophrenia brain scores stratified patients with functional disability, while UHR scores predicted better outcomes. Together, these findings indicate that psychosis-risk syndromes differ markedly in the diagnostic specificity, biopsychosocial informativeness and prognostic value of their underlying brain signatures. UHR symptoms are linked to a weak and diagnostically unspecific brain pattern, while the MIXED phenotype is characterised by a dimensional, transdiagnostic signature enriched across early psychotic and affective disease states. In contrast, COGDIS aligns with a neurodevelopmentally grounded vulnerability pattern that converges with schizophrenia's cognitive-disorganisation dimension. These distinctions support a biologically informed reconceptualization of psychosis risk, with cognitive basic symptoms capturing a core liability dimension of schizophrenia, while other risk states reflecting more transient processes underlying psychotic symptom expression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/96968
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biosignatures of cognitive basic symptoms mark a distinct neurodevelopmental pathway to schizophrenia.

Stephan Ruhrmann, Nora Penzel, Madalina Buciuman, Anastasia Theodoridou et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Biosignatures of cognitive basic symptoms mark a distinct neurodevelopmental pathway to schizophrenia.

Stephan Ruhrmann, Nora Penzel, Madalina Buciuman, Anastasia Theodoridou, Maria Fernanda Urquijo-Castro, Carlo Maj, Lisa Hahn, David Popovic, Clara Vetter, Wulf Rössler, Katharine Chisholm, Alexandra Korda, Shalaila S. Haas, Karsten Heekeren, L. Neuner, Dominic Dwyer, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Markus Noethen, Rebekka Lencer, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Paris Alexandros Lalousis, Udo Dannlowski, Stefan Borgwardt, Theresa Lichtenstein, Rachel Upthegrove, Raimo K R Salokangas, Eva Meisenzahl, Joseph Kambeitz, Clara Weyer, Alessandro Bertolino, Georg Romer, Peter Falkai, Linda A Antonucci, Christos Pantelis, Paolo Brambilla, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Stephen J Wood, Jarmo Hietala, Anita Riecher-Rössler
article en

Abstract

Efforts to predict schizophrenia risk using biological data have been hampered by the heterogeneity of current "clinical-high-risk" (CHR-P) criteria, which pool phenomenologically and biologically distinct syndromes under a single label. In particular, the field has focused almost exclusively on ultra-high-risk (UHR) symptoms, while cognitive basic symptoms (COGDIS)-despite their close alignment with schizophrenia's core features such as formal thought disorder-have remained underutilised. To date, no study has directly compared brain signatures of different CHR-P definitions with respect to their similarity to schizophrenia and their diagnostic, biopsychosocial, and prognostic profiles. We applied machine learning to structural MRI data from 1,425 patients (CHR-P subgroups, recent-onset psychosis, depression) and 907 healthy controls to derive and compare diagnostic brain signatures for Cognitive Disturbances (COGDIS), Ultra-High-Risk (UHR), their overlap (MIXED), and schizophrenia. The MIXED and UHR signatures lacked diagnostic separability and similarity with schizophrenia. Contrarily, the COGDIS signature distinguished patients from controls (BAC=69%, P < .001) and aligned with the schizophrenia signature (r = 0.60), involving shared fronto-parieto-perisylvian volume reductions. UHR was characterised by volume enlargements, whereas MIXED exhibited a mixed pattern of reductions and enlargements relative to healthy controls. COGDIS and schizophrenia signature expressions were predictable with 12%-21% variance explained based on polygenic, cognitive, and exposomal factors both in a transdiagnostic patient cohort and in healthy controls. Their expressions increased from health to schizophrenia. MIXED signature expression was also predictable from biopsychosocial data, but with higher explained variance in patient samples (21%) than in healthy controls (3%). UHR signature expression showed no significant biopsychosocial predictability in either group. Cell-enriched polygenic risk profiles differed across signatures, with COGDIS and schizophrenia showing enrichment patterns implicated in neurodevelopmental processes, while MIXED being associated with immune- and blood-brain-barrier-related enrichments. Longitudinally, COGDIS and schizophrenia brain scores stratified patients with functional disability, while UHR scores predicted better outcomes. Together, these findings indicate that psychosis-risk syndromes differ markedly in the diagnostic specificity, biopsychosocial informativeness and prognostic value of their underlying brain signatures. UHR symptoms are linked to a weak and diagnostically unspecific brain pattern, while the MIXED phenotype is characterised by a dimensional, transdiagnostic signature enriched across early psychotic and affective disease states. In contrast, COGDIS aligns with a neurodevelopmentally grounded vulnerability pattern that converges with schizophrenia's cognitive-disorganisation dimension. These distinctions support a biologically informed reconceptualization of psychosis risk, with cognitive basic symptoms capturing a core liability dimension of schizophrenia, while other risk states reflecting more transient processes underlying psychotic symptom expression.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University College Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.