Muslim Apologists on Euthanasia

<p>Euthanasia—which is usually defined as ending a patient’s life for compassionate reasons, most notably to alleviate pain—is a highly controversial issue in modern moral philosophy, including in contemporary Arab thought. Although secular Arab writers rarely addressed the topic in depth, contemporary Muslim thinkers, especially those working in the field of law or Islamic jurisprudence and ethics, have paid much attention to it because of its close connection to Islam’s vision of life, death, and divine providence. This research aims to analyze and evaluate the arguments of these thinkers based on contemporary analytical philosophy. Although contemporary Muslim jurists and thinkers primarily oppose euthanasia on theological grounds, they sometimes resort to popular humanitarian and secular arguments or justifications, such as the claim that life is sacred or that the risks that may result from legalizing euthanasia are harmful. This study showed that the positions of these thinkers are based on a set of logical fallacies and weak evidence that do not stand up to rigorous scrutiny. These critical flaws not only undermine their arguments but also highlight the need for a more coherent philosophical framework to adequately address the ethical complexities of euthanasia.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/a512
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muslim Apologists on Euthanasia

Ayman Haj-Yasin
The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Muslim Apologists on Euthanasia

Ayman Haj-Yasin
article en

Abstract

<p>Euthanasia—which is usually defined as ending a patient’s life for compassionate reasons, most notably to alleviate pain—is a highly controversial issue in modern moral philosophy, including in contemporary Arab thought. Although secular Arab writers rarely addressed the topic in depth, contemporary Muslim thinkers, especially those working in the field of law or Islamic jurisprudence and ethics, have paid much attention to it because of its close connection to Islam’s vision of life, death, and divine providence. This research aims to analyze and evaluate the arguments of these thinkers based on contemporary analytical philosophy. Although contemporary Muslim jurists and thinkers primarily oppose euthanasia on theological grounds, they sometimes resort to popular humanitarian and secular arguments or justifications, such as the claim that life is sacred or that the risks that may result from legalizing euthanasia are harmful. This study showed that the positions of these thinkers are based on a set of logical fallacies and weak evidence that do not stand up to rigorous scrutiny. These critical flaws not only undermine their arguments but also highlight the need for a more coherent philosophical framework to adequately address the ethical complexities of euthanasia.</p>

The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Irbid National University (JO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.