Water‐Filled Porosity 2D Imaging—Part 1: Theoretical Workflow

ABSTRACT Heterogeneous reservoirs, especially shaly formations, are challenging in reservoir characterization. Porosity and fluid distribution vary in both vertical and lateral directions. High‐resolution oil‐based mud (OBM) conductivity images are commonly acquired to help to reveal formation conductivity heterogeneities, azimuthally and vertically. With calibrated formation conductivity from the conductivity images, water‐filled porosity () 2D images may be obtained by using Archie type models, provided formation shaliness, water salinity and Archie parameters are given. In megahertz electromagnetic (EM) wave frequencies where the OBM imager is operating, porous rock interfacial polarization is very complex. Factors such as water‐filled porosity (), water salinity, water phase tortuosity () and the connection of the pores interact among themselves non‐linearly and all contribute to the overall responses of rock conductivity and dielectric permittivity. For example, for the same , higher will result in a decrease in rock conductivity. This can be confusing with a decrease in if rock dielectric permittivity is not taken into consideration. This non‐linear interaction among the rock parameters is not captured by the Archie model properly, especially in complex pore systems with high interfacial polarization such as in carbonate and shaly rock types. The latest generation of OBM imager can derive both conductivity and permittivity images. However, due to the lack of quantitative characterization, use of those images is greatly limited to relative image feature identification and extraction. In this article, for the first time, we provide a multi‐kernel electrical image quantification scheme and develop a workflow to derive and images, in 2D, independent of the Archie model. The workflow takes advantage of a high‐resolution pad‐based conductivity and permittivity imager, which operates at tens of megahertz, and a multifrequency dielectric tool, which operates at a wide range of frequencies ranging from tens of megahertz up to gigahertz. The OBM imager can provide high‐resolution conductivity and dielectric permittivity 2D images through advanced inversion processing, once the following challenges below are resolved: Understand rock responses at tens of megahertz and identify key constraint rock parameter configurations for deriving 2D images of and . Characterize the OBM imager processing bias and its impact on the dielectric rock model inversion. Evaluate compatibility between the OBM imager and the multifrequency dielectric tool data that provide the key rock parameters. To quantify the OBM imager processing, a multi‐kernel method is used on synthetic rocks covering a wide range of rock parameters. Exploratory data analysis is applied to better understand the relationships between rock parameters and OBM imager processing bias and its impact on dielectric rock model inversion. Uncertainty study is used to identify key rock parameters in deriving and images at the imager's frequency. The synthetic data results are further verified on the laboratory core plugs. This workflow is generic in clean formation and can apply to all the rock resistivity ranges, including resistivity below 1 ohm m.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Prospecting
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.70173
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water‐Filled Porosity 2D Imaging—Part 1: Theoretical Workflow

Muhanned Alsaif, Laurent Mossé, Simone Di Santo, Peter Schlicht et al.
1 citations
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
27.02
article

Water‐Filled Porosity 2D Imaging—Part 1: Theoretical Workflow

Muhanned Alsaif, Laurent Mossé, Simone Di Santo, Peter Schlicht, Shouxiang Ma, Yong‐Hua Chen, Tianhua Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Heterogeneous reservoirs, especially shaly formations, are challenging in reservoir characterization. Porosity and fluid distribution vary in both vertical and lateral directions. High‐resolution oil‐based mud (OBM) conductivity images are commonly acquired to help to reveal formation conductivity heterogeneities, azimuthally and vertically. With calibrated formation conductivity from the conductivity images, water‐filled porosity () 2D images may be obtained by using Archie type models, provided formation shaliness, water salinity and Archie parameters are given. In megahertz electromagnetic (EM) wave frequencies where the OBM imager is operating, porous rock interfacial polarization is very complex. Factors such as water‐filled porosity (), water salinity, water phase tortuosity () and the connection of the pores interact among themselves non‐linearly and all contribute to the overall responses of rock conductivity and dielectric permittivity. For example, for the same , higher will result in a decrease in rock conductivity. This can be confusing with a decrease in if rock dielectric permittivity is not taken into consideration. This non‐linear interaction among the rock parameters is not captured by the Archie model properly, especially in complex pore systems with high interfacial polarization such as in carbonate and shaly rock types. The latest generation of OBM imager can derive both conductivity and permittivity images. However, due to the lack of quantitative characterization, use of those images is greatly limited to relative image feature identification and extraction. In this article, for the first time, we provide a multi‐kernel electrical image quantification scheme and develop a workflow to derive and images, in 2D, independent of the Archie model. The workflow takes advantage of a high‐resolution pad‐based conductivity and permittivity imager, which operates at tens of megahertz, and a multifrequency dielectric tool, which operates at a wide range of frequencies ranging from tens of megahertz up to gigahertz. The OBM imager can provide high‐resolution conductivity and dielectric permittivity 2D images through advanced inversion processing, once the following challenges below are resolved: Understand rock responses at tens of megahertz and identify key constraint rock parameter configurations for deriving 2D images of and . Characterize the OBM imager processing bias and its impact on the dielectric rock model inversion. Evaluate compatibility between the OBM imager and the multifrequency dielectric tool data that provide the key rock parameters. To quantify the OBM imager processing, a multi‐kernel method is used on synthetic rocks covering a wide range of rock parameters. Exploratory data analysis is applied to better understand the relationships between rock parameters and OBM imager processing bias and its impact on dielectric rock model inversion. Uncertainty study is used to identify key rock parameters in deriving and images at the imager's frequency. The synthetic data results are further verified on the laboratory core plugs. This workflow is generic in clean formation and can apply to all the rock resistivity ranges, including resistivity below 1 ohm m.

Geophysical ProspectingVol. 74(4)
Schlumberger (British Virgin Islands) (VG), King Saud Medical City (SA), Urban College of Boston (US), Schlumberger (France) (FR), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA), Dhahran Health Center (SA), Institutul Teologic Baptist din București (RO), Saudi Aramco (United States) (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
27.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.