Surgical techniques for caudal septal deviations
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Caudal septal deviation represents a challenging surgical problem with significant functional and aesthetic implications. This review examines recent advances in surgical techniques for correcting caudal septal deviations, with emphasis on appropriate technique selection based on deviation type and severity. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical management of caudal septal deviation has evolved toward more nuanced, tissue-preserving approaches that balance adequate correction with maintenance of structural integrity. Contemporary practice emphasizes cartilage remodelling when anatomically appropriate, with techniques ranging from simple suture stabilization to complex reconstruction with grafting. Improved understanding of nasal septal biomechanics, including regional thickness variations and critical junction points, has enabled more rational surgical planning and technique selection. Recognition that deviation severity, cartilage quality, and the presence of concomitant deformities should guide approach selection has led to algorithm-based treatment strategies. SUMMARY: Successful management requires thorough anatomical understanding, accurate classification of deviation type, and appropriate technique matching to pathology. A graduated surgical approach progressing from conservative remodelling to complex reconstruction optimizes outcomes while minimizing complications. No single technique addresses all deviation patterns; the modern surgeon must command multiple approaches and understand their respective indications, advantages, and limitations to achieve consistently favourable results.
Authors
- Catherine Meller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2321-3685)
- Emma Ho
- Joseph Latif
Institutions
- Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery
- Published
- 2026-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000001130
- Primary Topic
- Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00