Community-Based Mental Healthcare for Adults with Intellectual Disability: a scoping review of current models of care

<ns5:p>Background Community-based mental healthcare is vital for individuals with intellectual disability, who are at increased risk of experiencing mental health difficulties. Despite this need, access to appropriate care is often limited due to barriers such as inadequate professional knowledge, poor communication, and fragmented services. Current service models may over-rely on behavioural and pharmacological interventions, with limited use of psychosocial approaches. This imbalance may contribute to placement instability and increased rates of hospital admission. Aim To map and synthesise the existing evidence on models of community-based mental health care for adults with intellectual disability and examine how these models are structured, the key enablers and barriers influencing their delivery and accessibility, and gaps in the current evidence base. Methods This scoping review synthesised findings from fifteen peer-reviewed papers examining models of community-based mental healthcare models for adults with intellectual disability, following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Results The synthesis identified four interrelated themes relating to models of care, enablers, barriers and workforce challenges, highlighting variation in service configuration, accessibility and implementation across settings. Conclusions While integrated care models and person-centred approaches show promise for improving community mental health care for people with intellectual disability, current provision reflects a fragmented landscape of partial models rather than a coherent system of care. Substantial challenges remain, including persistent access barriers, workforce limitations, and inconsistent implementation of trauma-informed practices. Addressing these issues is critical to achieving more equitable, acceptable, and sustainable community mental healthcare for adults with intellectual disability.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.178215.1
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-Based Mental Healthcare for Adults with Intellectual Disability: a scoping review of current models of care

Michaela Thomson, Alex Cookson, Sujeet Jaydeokar, Satheesh Gangadharan et al.
F1000Research
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Community-Based Mental Healthcare for Adults with Intellectual Disability: a scoping review of current models of care

Michaela Thomson, Alex Cookson, Sujeet Jaydeokar, Satheesh Gangadharan, Caroline Mogan, S. Lane, Dipti Patil, Jonathan Williams, Danny Acton, Amy Shaw, Maisie Innes
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Background Community-based mental healthcare is vital for individuals with intellectual disability, who are at increased risk of experiencing mental health difficulties. Despite this need, access to appropriate care is often limited due to barriers such as inadequate professional knowledge, poor communication, and fragmented services. Current service models may over-rely on behavioural and pharmacological interventions, with limited use of psychosocial approaches. This imbalance may contribute to placement instability and increased rates of hospital admission. Aim To map and synthesise the existing evidence on models of community-based mental health care for adults with intellectual disability and examine how these models are structured, the key enablers and barriers influencing their delivery and accessibility, and gaps in the current evidence base. Methods This scoping review synthesised findings from fifteen peer-reviewed papers examining models of community-based mental healthcare models for adults with intellectual disability, following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Results The synthesis identified four interrelated themes relating to models of care, enablers, barriers and workforce challenges, highlighting variation in service configuration, accessibility and implementation across settings. Conclusions While integrated care models and person-centred approaches show promise for improving community mental health care for people with intellectual disability, current provision reflects a fragmented landscape of partial models rather than a coherent system of care. Substantial challenges remain, including persistent access barriers, workforce limitations, and inconsistent implementation of trauma-informed practices. Addressing these issues is critical to achieving more equitable, acceptable, and sustainable community mental healthcare for adults with intellectual disability.</ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Cheshire West and Chester (GB), Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB), Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.