Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly after a diabetic foot event. Nevertheless, the relative effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for long-term outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Using the Taiwan Health and Welfare Data Center database, we identified 2,597 adults with type 2 diabetes who experienced their first diabetic foot disease (DFD) event with concurrent PAD between 2016 and 2019 and subsequently received a single antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after stabilization. Outcomes included major lower extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics indicated higher comorbidity burdens in the clopidogrel and cilostazol groups. After adjustment, the risks of LEA and MACE did not differ significantly among treatment groups. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a higher risk of MALE (sHR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15-1.84]), whereas clopidogrel showed a nonsignificant trend (sHR 1.31 [95% CI 0.99-1.72]). Both cilostazol (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.06-1.39]) and clopidogrel (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.07-1.46]) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant mortality differences among dialysis patients, and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients with PAD and a history of a foot event, aspirin was associated with comparable limb and cardiovascular outcomes, and potentially favorable survival, compared with clopidogrel or cilostazol. These observational findings suggest aspirin is a practical antiplatelet option for secondary prevention in this high-risk population, though further precise trials are needed to verify.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2653300
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease

Shih‐Yuan Hung, I-Wen Chen, Chia‐Hung Lin, Yu-Yao Huang et al.
Annals of Medicine
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Prognostic implications of single antiplatelet therapy in individuals developing diabetic foot disease with concurrent peripheral arterial disease

Shih‐Yuan Hung, I-Wen Chen, Chia‐Hung Lin, Yu-Yao Huang, Cheng-Wei Lin, Pi‐Hua Liu, Chung‐Huei Huang, Yi-Chia Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for secondary prevention in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly after a diabetic foot event. Nevertheless, the relative effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for long-term outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Using the Taiwan Health and Welfare Data Center database, we identified 2,597 adults with type 2 diabetes who experienced their first diabetic foot disease (DFD) event with concurrent PAD between 2016 and 2019 and subsequently received a single antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after stabilization. Outcomes included major lower extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and subdistribution HRs (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics indicated higher comorbidity burdens in the clopidogrel and cilostazol groups. After adjustment, the risks of LEA and MACE did not differ significantly among treatment groups. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol was associated with a higher risk of MALE (sHR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15-1.84]), whereas clopidogrel showed a nonsignificant trend (sHR 1.31 [95% CI 0.99-1.72]). Both cilostazol (HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.06-1.39]) and clopidogrel (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.07-1.46]) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed no significant mortality differences among dialysis patients, and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients with PAD and a history of a foot event, aspirin was associated with comparable limb and cardiovascular outcomes, and potentially favorable survival, compared with clopidogrel or cilostazol. These observational findings suggest aspirin is a practical antiplatelet option for secondary prevention in this high-risk population, though further precise trials are needed to verify.

Annals of MedicineVol. 58(1)
Memorial Hospital of South Bend (US), Chang Gung University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.