Static strength estimation of frozen soils using DEM-verified and optimized tree-based algorithms

Freeze-thaw soil degradation significantly compromises the stability of foundations, roads, and pipelines, leading to costly repairs and increased environmental risks due to soil erosion and altered drainage patterns. Employing machine learning technological advances, a predictive method for soil static strength (S s ) is developed to characterize the degradation of soil under frozen conditions accurately. Water content ( W c ), negative temperature ( T N ), confining pressure ( C P ), freeze–thaw cycles ( N F - T ), thawing time ( T T ), and compaction degree ( k ) were introduced as input attributes. A technique known as random forest ( RF ) regression analysis is considered. The RF ’s hyperparameters have a notable influence on the correctness of the simulation, where the Reptile Search Algorithm ( RSA ), Red Fox Optimization ( RFO ), and Grey Wolf Optimization ( GWO ) were employed for this goal, (hybrid models called RF ( R S A ) , RF ( R F O ) , and RF ( G W O ) ). A numerical verification was performed utilizing the discrete element method ( DEM ) to confirm further the prediction power of the proposed machine learning models. The findings show that there is considerable potential for the RF ( R F O ) , RF ( R S A ) , and RF ( G W O ) approaches to predict the S s of seasonally frozen soils with high accuracy. Compared to the models from literature, the proposed RF ( R F O ) model demonstrated higher accuracy. For example, while artificial neural network ( ANN ) and principal component analysis– ANN ( PCA - A N N ) achieved R 2 values of 0.97 and 0.96, RF ( R F O ) (present study) reached 0.9896 in training and 0.9937 in testing. The RF ( R F O ) method demonstrated negligible discrepancies from the experimental S s values, with variations ranging from −0.4067% to 2.5455%. Conversely, the DEM approach exhibited somewhat greater deviations in certain instances, such as −5.773% and 4.857%; however, it consistently maintained a generally dependable accuracy trend.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2026.101774
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Static strength estimation of frozen soils using DEM-verified and optimized tree-based algorithms

Cheng Dong, Qiang Shao, Shaokun Du, Jie Meng
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Climate change and permafrost
article

Static strength estimation of frozen soils using DEM-verified and optimized tree-based algorithms

Cheng Dong, Qiang Shao, Shaokun Du, Jie Meng
article en

Abstract

Freeze-thaw soil degradation significantly compromises the stability of foundations, roads, and pipelines, leading to costly repairs and increased environmental risks due to soil erosion and altered drainage patterns. Employing machine learning technological advances, a predictive method for soil static strength (S s ) is developed to characterize the degradation of soil under frozen conditions accurately. Water content ( W c ), negative temperature ( T N ), confining pressure ( C P ), freeze–thaw cycles ( N F - T ), thawing time ( T T ), and compaction degree ( k ) were introduced as input attributes. A technique known as random forest ( RF ) regression analysis is considered. The RF ’s hyperparameters have a notable influence on the correctness of the simulation, where the Reptile Search Algorithm ( RSA ), Red Fox Optimization ( RFO ), and Grey Wolf Optimization ( GWO ) were employed for this goal, (hybrid models called RF ( R S A ) , RF ( R F O ) , and RF ( G W O ) ). A numerical verification was performed utilizing the discrete element method ( DEM ) to confirm further the prediction power of the proposed machine learning models. The findings show that there is considerable potential for the RF ( R F O ) , RF ( R S A ) , and RF ( G W O ) approaches to predict the S s of seasonally frozen soils with high accuracy. Compared to the models from literature, the proposed RF ( R F O ) model demonstrated higher accuracy. For example, while artificial neural network ( ANN ) and principal component analysis– ANN ( PCA - A N N ) achieved R 2 values of 0.97 and 0.96, RF ( R F O ) (present study) reached 0.9896 in training and 0.9937 in testing. The RF ( R F O ) method demonstrated negligible discrepancies from the experimental S s values, with variations ranging from −0.4067% to 2.5455%. Conversely, the DEM approach exhibited somewhat greater deviations in certain instances, such as −5.773% and 4.857%; however, it consistently maintained a generally dependable accuracy trend.

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONSVol. 66(3)
Water Research Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate change and permafrost
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.