Cost-effectiveness of combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella support (ECPELLA) in infarct-related cardiogenic shock

Abstract Aims Cardiogenic shock carries high early mortality. Combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella support (ECPELLA) may improve outcomes but is costly and unevenly available across Europe. Its incremental clinical and economic value compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains uncertain. Methods We developed a calibrated partitioned-survival model comparing ECPELLA with GDMT over a 10-year horizon from a statutory health insurance payer perspective (2024€ reference costing environment). Costs, utilities, and survival inputs were derived from contemporary randomized trials and multinational registries. Uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic, deterministic, scenario, and value-of-information analyses. European cost-environment scenarios were explored to assess transferability Results ECPELLA yielded 4.05 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at €195,000 versus 3.10 QALYs at €95,000 for GDMT (incremental cost €100,000; incremental QALY 0.95), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €105,263 per QALY. Device and intensive care unit (ICU) costs and early survival effects were the main drivers of uncertainty. Cost-effectiveness improved in patients younger than 60 years, those with reversible myocardial dysfunction, early cannulation, and treatment in high-volume centers (ICER €60,000–80,000 per QALY), whereas neutral survival effects produced ICERs exceeding €300,000 per QALY. Value-of-information analysis indicated residual decision uncertainty. Conclusions ECPELLA increased quality-adjusted survival at higher cost. In the base-case analysis, the ICER was €105,263 per QALY gained. In predefined scenario analyses, ICERs were lower in younger patients, those with recovery potential, early cannulation, and high-volume centers. Residual decision uncertainty was observed in value-of-information analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal Open
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag064
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella support (ECPELLA) in infarct-related cardiogenic shock

Christoph Struenck, Andrija Matetić, Bernhard Unsoeld, Michael Buerke et al.
European Heart Journal Open
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Cost-effectiveness of combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella support (ECPELLA) in infarct-related cardiogenic shock

Christoph Struenck, Andrija Matetić, Bernhard Unsoeld, Michael Buerke, Priyanka Boettger, Jamschid Sedighi, S T Sossalla, Dirk Westermann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Cardiogenic shock carries high early mortality. Combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella support (ECPELLA) may improve outcomes but is costly and unevenly available across Europe. Its incremental clinical and economic value compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains uncertain. Methods We developed a calibrated partitioned-survival model comparing ECPELLA with GDMT over a 10-year horizon from a statutory health insurance payer perspective (2024€ reference costing environment). Costs, utilities, and survival inputs were derived from contemporary randomized trials and multinational registries. Uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic, deterministic, scenario, and value-of-information analyses. European cost-environment scenarios were explored to assess transferability Results ECPELLA yielded 4.05 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at €195,000 versus 3.10 QALYs at €95,000 for GDMT (incremental cost €100,000; incremental QALY 0.95), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €105,263 per QALY. Device and intensive care unit (ICU) costs and early survival effects were the main drivers of uncertainty. Cost-effectiveness improved in patients younger than 60 years, those with reversible myocardial dysfunction, early cannulation, and treatment in high-volume centers (ICER €60,000–80,000 per QALY), whereas neutral survival effects produced ICERs exceeding €300,000 per QALY. Value-of-information analysis indicated residual decision uncertainty. Conclusions ECPELLA increased quality-adjusted survival at higher cost. In the base-case analysis, the ICER was €105,263 per QALY gained. In predefined scenario analyses, ICERs were lower in younger patients, those with recovery potential, early cannulation, and high-volume centers. Residual decision uncertainty was observed in value-of-information analyses.

European Heart Journal Open
University of Freiburg (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University of Siegen (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus Wien (AT), Kerckhoff Klinik (DE), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (DE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), University of Split (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.