Cardiopulmonary monitoring in low-resource settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss cardiopulmonary monitoring strategies during resuscitation of shock in resource-limited settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite substantial advances in critical care over recent decades, major disparities in access to cardiopulmonary monitoring persist worldwide. In resource-limited settings, shock management must rely on the optimal use of basic monitoring, including clinical examination and low-cost physiological surrogates of cardiac output and tissue oxygenation. However, each of these tools has important limitations and no single variable accurately predicts fluid responsiveness or tissue perfusion. Evidence supporting routine use of more complex indices, such as central venous oxygen saturation or venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference, has been challenged by lack of efficacy. Recent trials highlight the feasibility of physiology-driven, personalized resuscitation strategies; however, the results need careful interpretation. SUMMARY: Cardiopulmonary monitoring during shock resuscitation in resource-limited settings should prioritize a pragmatic, physiology-based integration of available monitoring tools. Future research must focus on validating simple, affordable strategies and defining context-adapted approaches capable of improving outcomes in these vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mcc.0000000000001382
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiopulmonary monitoring in low-resource settings

Vanina Kanoore Edul, C Y González
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Cardiopulmonary monitoring in low-resource settings

Vanina Kanoore Edul, C Y González
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss cardiopulmonary monitoring strategies during resuscitation of shock in resource-limited settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite substantial advances in critical care over recent decades, major disparities in access to cardiopulmonary monitoring persist worldwide. In resource-limited settings, shock management must rely on the optimal use of basic monitoring, including clinical examination and low-cost physiological surrogates of cardiac output and tissue oxygenation. However, each of these tools has important limitations and no single variable accurately predicts fluid responsiveness or tissue perfusion. Evidence supporting routine use of more complex indices, such as central venous oxygen saturation or venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference, has been challenged by lack of efficacy. Recent trials highlight the feasibility of physiology-driven, personalized resuscitation strategies; however, the results need careful interpretation. SUMMARY: Cardiopulmonary monitoring during shock resuscitation in resource-limited settings should prioritize a pragmatic, physiology-based integration of available monitoring tools. Future research must focus on validating simple, affordable strategies and defining context-adapted approaches capable of improving outcomes in these vulnerable populations.

Current Opinion in Critical CareVol. 32(3)
Hospital Fernández (AR), Centro Científico Tecnólogico - Rosario (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.