Social identity formation among Pride parade participants

Introduction: This study examines the formation of social identity among Pride parade participants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 individuals who participated in Pride parades in Japan, including 24 identified as LGBT+, 9 as non-LGBT+, and 3 as unspecified. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Findings: The process of social identity formation was categorized into four stages: (1) Belonging to the In-Group, (2) Behaving as an In-Group Member, (3) Recognizing One's Role within the In-Group, and (4) Universalizing the In-Group Identity. In the Belonging stage, participants perceived themselves as the in-group while positioning heteronormative society as the out-group. In the Behaving stage, shared practices such as carrying rainbow flags and chanting reinforced group solidarity. In the Recognizing stage, participants were differentiated into Core and Supporting roles, highlighting internal role differentiation. In the Universalizing stage, participants emphasized attitudinal differences between in-group and out-group while simultaneously expressing a goal of dissolving such boundaries. Discussion: These findings contribute to the application of social identity theory to Pride parade participation by demonstrating how collective action fosters shared identity formation among both LGBT+ and non-LGBT+ participants. The study also identifies a novel in-group-out-group configuration, conceptualized as the in-group within the out-group, and suggests the potential for integrating queer theory, particularly the concept of performativity, with social identity theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sociology
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1719108
Primary Topic
Social Power and Status Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social identity formation among Pride parade participants

Chikako Tanimoto, Liya Ai
Frontiers in Sociology
Social Power and Status Dynamics
article

Social identity formation among Pride parade participants

Chikako Tanimoto, Liya Ai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the formation of social identity among Pride parade participants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 individuals who participated in Pride parades in Japan, including 24 identified as LGBT+, 9 as non-LGBT+, and 3 as unspecified. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Findings: The process of social identity formation was categorized into four stages: (1) Belonging to the In-Group, (2) Behaving as an In-Group Member, (3) Recognizing One's Role within the In-Group, and (4) Universalizing the In-Group Identity. In the Belonging stage, participants perceived themselves as the in-group while positioning heteronormative society as the out-group. In the Behaving stage, shared practices such as carrying rainbow flags and chanting reinforced group solidarity. In the Recognizing stage, participants were differentiated into Core and Supporting roles, highlighting internal role differentiation. In the Universalizing stage, participants emphasized attitudinal differences between in-group and out-group while simultaneously expressing a goal of dissolving such boundaries. Discussion: These findings contribute to the application of social identity theory to Pride parade participation by demonstrating how collective action fosters shared identity formation among both LGBT+ and non-LGBT+ participants. The study also identifies a novel in-group-out-group configuration, conceptualized as the in-group within the out-group, and suggests the potential for integrating queer theory, particularly the concept of performativity, with social identity theory.

Frontiers in SociologyVol. 11
Gender Studies (CZ), Nagoya University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Social Power and Status Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.