Interventions to reduce restrictive practices in residential aged care homes: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: A restraint-free environment is a human right for people living in residential aged care (RAC). Yet restrictive practices continue to be frequently used in these settings. A scoping review of interventions is required to inform future practice and research. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterise interventions that have been implemented to reduce the use of restrictive practices on residents of RAC. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted of peer reviewed articles that reported on interventions implemented in RAC to reduce restraint use. Databases searched included Ageline, CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase. Bronfenbrenner's Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used to characterise and present the interventions. RESULTS: Seventy studies were included; 52 studies addressed one SEM level (macro-system, exo-system or micro-system) and 18 studies addressed two SEM levels (exo-system and meso‑system; exo-system and micro-system). No interventions were identified at the meso‑system level. Educational interventions were the most frequently recorded (31 studies), although there was a lack of detail in the reporting. Reductions in physical restraint were maintained over time, with varied outcomes regarding chemical restraint. CONCLUSION: Reduction in restraint use in RAC is complex, although most interventions focused on one SEM level of influence only. Positively, studies consistently reported reductions in physical restraint over time, reinforcing the benefits of implementing targeted interventions to reduce restraint use. Further research is needed to examine the benefits of interventions targeting multiple SEM levels and considering all forms of restraint. Findings from this review can inform future interventional studies to reduce restraint use in RAC. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/7v4b2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2026.106261
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions to reduce restrictive practices in residential aged care homes: a scoping review

Suzanne Dawson, Candice Oster, Thiviyah Raman, Stacey George
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Interventions to reduce restrictive practices in residential aged care homes: a scoping review

Suzanne Dawson, Candice Oster, Thiviyah Raman, Stacey George
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A restraint-free environment is a human right for people living in residential aged care (RAC). Yet restrictive practices continue to be frequently used in these settings. A scoping review of interventions is required to inform future practice and research. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterise interventions that have been implemented to reduce the use of restrictive practices on residents of RAC. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted of peer reviewed articles that reported on interventions implemented in RAC to reduce restraint use. Databases searched included Ageline, CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase. Bronfenbrenner's Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was used to characterise and present the interventions. RESULTS: Seventy studies were included; 52 studies addressed one SEM level (macro-system, exo-system or micro-system) and 18 studies addressed two SEM levels (exo-system and meso‑system; exo-system and micro-system). No interventions were identified at the meso‑system level. Educational interventions were the most frequently recorded (31 studies), although there was a lack of detail in the reporting. Reductions in physical restraint were maintained over time, with varied outcomes regarding chemical restraint. CONCLUSION: Reduction in restraint use in RAC is complex, although most interventions focused on one SEM level of influence only. Positively, studies consistently reported reductions in physical restraint over time, reinforcing the benefits of implementing targeted interventions to reduce restraint use. Further research is needed to examine the benefits of interventions targeting multiple SEM levels and considering all forms of restraint. Findings from this review can inform future interventional studies to reduce restraint use in RAC. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/7v4b2.

Archives of Gerontology and GeriatricsVol. 147
Flinders University (AU), Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.