Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy with patient-specific instrumentation: surgical technique, accuracy, and preliminary outcomes

Introduction and aim: Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCW-DFO) is a surgical technique used to treat symptomatic valgus knee deformity. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the reliability of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) in reproducing preoperative planning and to assess preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with MCW-DFO using the PSI technique compared to conventional instrumentation. This research was conducted within the framework of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), Mission 6-Health, as part of the PNRR-MAD-2022-12375978-PEARL Project, supporting the development of precision-based surgical strategies to prevent early osteoarthritis progression. Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2023, 34 patients underwent MCW-DFO, of whom 16 were treated with NewClip Technics PSI and met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Preoperative planning was performed using TraumaCad® software, identifying preoperative and planned mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) values. Postoperative measurements were obtained to determine the difference between planned and achieved alignment as an index of surgical reproducibility. Results: The difference between planned and postoperative values for mFTA and mLDFA angles differed significantly between the two groups. In the PSI group, mean postoperative values differed from planned values by 0.46° for mFTA and 0.66° for mLDFA. In contrast, in the conventional instrumentation group, the difference exceeded 2° for both angles. Conclusions: The PSI technique proved to be significantly more reliable than traditional instrumentation in adhering to preoperative planning in MCW-DFO. The integration of patient-specific technologies represents a precision-surgery approach consistent with PNRR objectives, potentially improving alignment accuracy and contributing to joint preservation strategies in patients at risk of early osteoarthritis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Surgery
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1738442
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy with patient-specific instrumentation: surgical technique, accuracy, and preliminary outcomes

A. Manunta, Stefano Pescia, Francesco Pisanu, Leonardo Puddu et al.
Frontiers in Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy with patient-specific instrumentation: surgical technique, accuracy, and preliminary outcomes

A. Manunta, Stefano Pescia, Francesco Pisanu, Leonardo Puddu, Giovanni Lugani, Hansheng Deng, Fabrizio Cortese, E. Fantinato, Francesco Perusi, Carlo Doria, Gianfilippo Caggiari
article en

Abstract

Introduction and aim: Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCW-DFO) is a surgical technique used to treat symptomatic valgus knee deformity. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the reliability of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) in reproducing preoperative planning and to assess preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with MCW-DFO using the PSI technique compared to conventional instrumentation. This research was conducted within the framework of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), Mission 6-Health, as part of the PNRR-MAD-2022-12375978-PEARL Project, supporting the development of precision-based surgical strategies to prevent early osteoarthritis progression. Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2023, 34 patients underwent MCW-DFO, of whom 16 were treated with NewClip Technics PSI and met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Preoperative planning was performed using TraumaCad® software, identifying preoperative and planned mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) values. Postoperative measurements were obtained to determine the difference between planned and achieved alignment as an index of surgical reproducibility. Results: The difference between planned and postoperative values for mFTA and mLDFA angles differed significantly between the two groups. In the PSI group, mean postoperative values differed from planned values by 0.46° for mFTA and 0.66° for mLDFA. In contrast, in the conventional instrumentation group, the difference exceeded 2° for both angles. Conclusions: The PSI technique proved to be significantly more reliable than traditional instrumentation in adhering to preoperative planning in MCW-DFO. The integration of patient-specific technologies represents a precision-surgery approach consistent with PNRR objectives, potentially improving alignment accuracy and contributing to joint preservation strategies in patients at risk of early osteoarthritis.

Frontiers in SurgeryVol. 13
University of Sassari (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari (IT), Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (IT), Mater Hospital (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
NextGenerationEU
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.