Evaluation and error attribution of evapotranspiration products over the Haihe River Basin: Implications for irrigation scheduling and agricultural water management

Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimates are vital in the water-stressed Haihe River Basin (HRB); however, the suitability and error modes of existing ET products remain unclear. This study develops an end-to-end diagnostic framework to reveal error mechanisms, define applicability limits, and link site-level error processes to basin-scale performance patterns. The framework's novelty lies in its multi-pronged attribution strategy designed to disentangle complex error sources. It leverages high-precision lysimeters and an eddy covariance (EC) network to separate and validate evaporation versus transpiration errors. It then integrates a physics-based scenario matrix to diagnose error patterns under distinct hydrothermal stresses, and employs a generalized additive model (GAM) to quantify nonlinear relationships between these errors and environmental drivers. The framework reveals systematic, condition-dependent error patterns: at site scale, products overestimate bare-soil evaporation but underestimate cropland transpiration; at basin scale, land-surface models generally show higher skill in near-natural mountain regions, whereas their skill is reduced in intensively managed, irrigation-dominated plains. Failure to capture the spring irrigation-driven ET peak is one factor contributing to this contrast. These irrigation-induced biases directly affect irrigation scheduling, agricultural water budget, and crop water requirement estimates. Product choice should be context-specific: GLEAM demonstrates a superior ability to capture irrigation signals in managed plains, whereas reanalysis products are more reliable in near-natural mountains. These investigations can help optimize water resource utilization and allocation in agricultural fields. • Site-scale evapotranspiration biases propagate to basin-scale errors. • Model errors vary by surface type with bare soil high and irrigated cropland low. • Missing spring irrigation peaks is a factor for lower model skill in irrigated fields. • Plains management need corrected satellite evapotranspiration to schedule irrigation. • Land surface models suit annual water accounting in near-natural mountains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110358
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and error attribution of evapotranspiration products over the Haihe River Basin: Implications for irrigation scheduling and agricultural water management

Shaohui Chen, Xiang Ju
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Evaluation and error attribution of evapotranspiration products over the Haihe River Basin: Implications for irrigation scheduling and agricultural water management

Shaohui Chen, Xiang Ju
article en

Abstract

Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimates are vital in the water-stressed Haihe River Basin (HRB); however, the suitability and error modes of existing ET products remain unclear. This study develops an end-to-end diagnostic framework to reveal error mechanisms, define applicability limits, and link site-level error processes to basin-scale performance patterns. The framework's novelty lies in its multi-pronged attribution strategy designed to disentangle complex error sources. It leverages high-precision lysimeters and an eddy covariance (EC) network to separate and validate evaporation versus transpiration errors. It then integrates a physics-based scenario matrix to diagnose error patterns under distinct hydrothermal stresses, and employs a generalized additive model (GAM) to quantify nonlinear relationships between these errors and environmental drivers. The framework reveals systematic, condition-dependent error patterns: at site scale, products overestimate bare-soil evaporation but underestimate cropland transpiration; at basin scale, land-surface models generally show higher skill in near-natural mountain regions, whereas their skill is reduced in intensively managed, irrigation-dominated plains. Failure to capture the spring irrigation-driven ET peak is one factor contributing to this contrast. These irrigation-induced biases directly affect irrigation scheduling, agricultural water budget, and crop water requirement estimates. Product choice should be context-specific: GLEAM demonstrates a superior ability to capture irrigation signals in managed plains, whereas reanalysis products are more reliable in near-natural mountains. These investigations can help optimize water resource utilization and allocation in agricultural fields. • Site-scale evapotranspiration biases propagate to basin-scale errors. • Model errors vary by surface type with bare soil high and irrigated cropland low. • Missing spring irrigation peaks is a factor for lower model skill in irrigated fields. • Plains management need corrected satellite evapotranspiration to schedule irrigation. • Land surface models suit annual water accounting in near-natural mountains.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 329
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.