Reducing frailty in frail people with multiple sclerosis: Feasibility of a 6-week multimodal exercise training program

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a prevalent and debilitating condition in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and is linked to poorer health outcomes. However, targeted interventions remain limited. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of a multimodal exercise training (MET) program to reduce frailty in frail people with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen frail people with MS (age = 55.0 ± 7.7 years, 81.3% female, Fried frailty score ≥3) participated in this pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to a 6-week MET program consisting of virtual reality treadmill training + resistance training (n = 8) or to a waitlist control group (n = 8). Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, and adherence rates as well as safety and user engagement throughout the study (Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire-SPFQ). Exploratory outcomes were collected at baseline and 6 weeks and included the Evaluative Frailty Index for Physical Activity (EFIP), the 54-item MS Quality of Life questionnaire (MSQoL-54), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). RESULTS: Fourteen participants, eight in the intervention group and six in the control group, completed the study. The recruitment rate was 0.33 participants/week, retention was 87.5%, and adherence was high, with participants completing 97.2% of planned training sessions. No adverse events or training-related pain were recorded. The data collection procedures were successfully implemented with complete outcome data. Participants agreed or strongly agreed with 95.7% of applicable SPFQ items, indicating high levels of engagement and satisfaction with the trial. Between-group differences in baseline to 6-week change were: EFIP -0.07 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.00); MSQoL-54 mental health +21.24 (95% CI: 7.32, 35.16); MSQoL-54 physical health +19.26 (95% CI: 5.61, 32.91); MFIS -11.46 (95% CI: -18.34, -5.13); and PPA -0.09 (95% CI: -1.19, 1.01). CONCLUSION: The MET program was safe, feasible, and well-received by frail people with MS. These findings support the viability of MET for future larger-scale trials targeting frailty reduction in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06042244.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347063
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing frailty in frail people with multiple sclerosis: Feasibility of a 6-week multimodal exercise training program

Bruce Robert Troen, Pedram Ahmadnezhad, Jacob J. Sosnoff, Tobia Zanotto et al.
PLoS ONE
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Reducing frailty in frail people with multiple sclerosis: Feasibility of a 6-week multimodal exercise training program

Bruce Robert Troen, Pedram Ahmadnezhad, Jacob J. Sosnoff, Tobia Zanotto, Hannes Devos, Abbas Tabatabaei, Jianghua He, Sharon Lynch, Jane Ibude, Lee D. Chaves, Madison Lysaught
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a prevalent and debilitating condition in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and is linked to poorer health outcomes. However, targeted interventions remain limited. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of a multimodal exercise training (MET) program to reduce frailty in frail people with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen frail people with MS (age = 55.0 ± 7.7 years, 81.3% female, Fried frailty score ≥3) participated in this pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to a 6-week MET program consisting of virtual reality treadmill training + resistance training (n = 8) or to a waitlist control group (n = 8). Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, and adherence rates as well as safety and user engagement throughout the study (Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire-SPFQ). Exploratory outcomes were collected at baseline and 6 weeks and included the Evaluative Frailty Index for Physical Activity (EFIP), the 54-item MS Quality of Life questionnaire (MSQoL-54), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). RESULTS: Fourteen participants, eight in the intervention group and six in the control group, completed the study. The recruitment rate was 0.33 participants/week, retention was 87.5%, and adherence was high, with participants completing 97.2% of planned training sessions. No adverse events or training-related pain were recorded. The data collection procedures were successfully implemented with complete outcome data. Participants agreed or strongly agreed with 95.7% of applicable SPFQ items, indicating high levels of engagement and satisfaction with the trial. Between-group differences in baseline to 6-week change were: EFIP -0.07 (95% CI: -0.14, -0.00); MSQoL-54 mental health +21.24 (95% CI: 7.32, 35.16); MSQoL-54 physical health +19.26 (95% CI: 5.61, 32.91); MFIS -11.46 (95% CI: -18.34, -5.13); and PPA -0.09 (95% CI: -1.19, 1.01). CONCLUSION: The MET program was safe, feasible, and well-received by frail people with MS. These findings support the viability of MET for future larger-scale trials targeting frailty reduction in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06042244.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Indiana University Health (US), University of South Florida (US), Veterans of Foreign Wars (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Kansas City VA Medical Center (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
National Multiple Sclerosis Society, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.