Fieldwork encounters: Navigation of relationships and the conundrums of ethnographic knowledge production

The paper examines the methodological challenges of conducting ethnographic research in complex research settings underpinned by social inequalities and power relations. It analyses how the quests for validity and mutuality were undermined by recurrent doubts that saturated relationships with my interlocutors—displaced communities and individuals occupying positions of power in Delhi. By examining authorial voices and silences, as well as the prevailing fault lines, it highlights the issues of trust, surveillance, and the need to deploy guerrilla research techniques to circumvent authorial sanctions. It offers an understanding of the limits of a single ethnographer who became visible across various interconnected field sites by examining the dialectics of revealing and concealing, and highlights ethnography as an embodied, affectively structured, and uncontrollable experience grounded in chance and contingency, rather than a purely objectivist endeavor. Ethnographic intersubjective encounters unwittingly allow interlocutors to enact their fantasies, thereby deepening our understanding of prevailing social relations and necessitating that we approach ethical concerns in a processual manner in the field sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnography
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381261443170
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fieldwork encounters: Navigation of relationships and the conundrums of ethnographic knowledge production

Sanjeev Routray
Ethnography
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Fieldwork encounters: Navigation of relationships and the conundrums of ethnographic knowledge production

Sanjeev Routray
article en

Abstract

The paper examines the methodological challenges of conducting ethnographic research in complex research settings underpinned by social inequalities and power relations. It analyses how the quests for validity and mutuality were undermined by recurrent doubts that saturated relationships with my interlocutors—displaced communities and individuals occupying positions of power in Delhi. By examining authorial voices and silences, as well as the prevailing fault lines, it highlights the issues of trust, surveillance, and the need to deploy guerrilla research techniques to circumvent authorial sanctions. It offers an understanding of the limits of a single ethnographer who became visible across various interconnected field sites by examining the dialectics of revealing and concealing, and highlights ethnography as an embodied, affectively structured, and uncontrollable experience grounded in chance and contingency, rather than a purely objectivist endeavor. Ethnographic intersubjective encounters unwittingly allow interlocutors to enact their fantasies, thereby deepening our understanding of prevailing social relations and necessitating that we approach ethical concerns in a processual manner in the field sites.

Ethnography
Universiti Brunei Darussalam (BN)
International Development Research Centre, IJURR Foundation, Urban Studies Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.