When Punishment Begins at Home: Understanding the Drivers of Penal Experience Within Norway’s Electronic Monitoring Program

Norway’s correctional geography has shifted dramatically, with 40% of “unconditional prison sentences” now being served exclusively via front-door electronic monitoring (EM). This turn to EM aims to reduce negative consequences of imprisonment, but how is EM experienced by those punished this way? Through interviews with EM-clients, this study analyzes penal experiences along Sexton’s framework of penal consciousness and Todd-Kvam’s framework of pain vs. suffering. Clients experienced pains from EM’s restrictions on their movements, but when weighed against imprisonment, the salience and severity of EM was often ameliorated. Some clients, however, experienced suffering, thus contrasting EM’s punitive contours, even as a penal alternative, against its proposed benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime & Delinquency
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287261440124
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Punishment Begins at Home: Understanding the Drivers of Penal Experience Within Norway’s Electronic Monitoring Program

John Todd-Kvam, Berit Johnsen, Benjamin Branaman
Crime & Delinquency
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

When Punishment Begins at Home: Understanding the Drivers of Penal Experience Within Norway’s Electronic Monitoring Program

John Todd-Kvam, Berit Johnsen, Benjamin Branaman
article en

Abstract

Norway’s correctional geography has shifted dramatically, with 40% of “unconditional prison sentences” now being served exclusively via front-door electronic monitoring (EM). This turn to EM aims to reduce negative consequences of imprisonment, but how is EM experienced by those punished this way? Through interviews with EM-clients, this study analyzes penal experiences along Sexton’s framework of penal consciousness and Todd-Kvam’s framework of pain vs. suffering. Clients experienced pains from EM’s restrictions on their movements, but when weighed against imprisonment, the salience and severity of EM was often ameliorated. Some clients, however, experienced suffering, thus contrasting EM’s punitive contours, even as a penal alternative, against its proposed benefits.

Crime & Delinquency
Norwegian Police University College (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.