Interpersonal ambivalence in depression: a psychodynamic perspective on the role of prosocial attitudes and latent aggression

This study aimed at examining the role of interpersonal ambivalence in the pathogenesis of depression within the framework of psychodynamic theory, focusing on the roles of latent aggression and heightened sense of responsibility in depression. A total of 479 participants were recruited from the general population. Depression severity was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and interpersonal ambivalence (latent aggression, responsibility, distrust) was measured with the Responsibility and Interpersonal Behaviors and Attitudes Questionnaire (RIBAQ-R). Data were analyzed using a general linear model repeated measures analysis to examine group differences on the RIBAQ subscales. Structural equation modeling was used to explore potential mediation effects of responsibility and latent aggression on depression. Latent aggression, responsibility, and distrust were significantly elevated in individuals with depression. To provide insight into possible causal mechanisms, we adopted mediation analyses. Latent aggression emerged as a mediator in the relationship between inflated responsibility and depression severity. These findings suggest that interpersonal ambivalence, particularly conflict between prosocial responsibility and antisocial latent aggression, contributes to depression, providing empirical evidence for psychodynamic theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2026.2651541
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpersonal ambivalence in depression: a psychodynamic perspective on the role of prosocial attitudes and latent aggression

Lea Schuurmans, Klaus Michael Reininger, Steffen Moritz, Lisa Borgmann
Cogent Psychology
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Interpersonal ambivalence in depression: a psychodynamic perspective on the role of prosocial attitudes and latent aggression

Lea Schuurmans, Klaus Michael Reininger, Steffen Moritz, Lisa Borgmann
article en

Abstract

This study aimed at examining the role of interpersonal ambivalence in the pathogenesis of depression within the framework of psychodynamic theory, focusing on the roles of latent aggression and heightened sense of responsibility in depression. A total of 479 participants were recruited from the general population. Depression severity was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and interpersonal ambivalence (latent aggression, responsibility, distrust) was measured with the Responsibility and Interpersonal Behaviors and Attitudes Questionnaire (RIBAQ-R). Data were analyzed using a general linear model repeated measures analysis to examine group differences on the RIBAQ subscales. Structural equation modeling was used to explore potential mediation effects of responsibility and latent aggression on depression. Latent aggression, responsibility, and distrust were significantly elevated in individuals with depression. To provide insight into possible causal mechanisms, we adopted mediation analyses. Latent aggression emerged as a mediator in the relationship between inflated responsibility and depression severity. These findings suggest that interpersonal ambivalence, particularly conflict between prosocial responsibility and antisocial latent aggression, contributes to depression, providing empirical evidence for psychodynamic theories.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Augsburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.