Unlocking insights into HIV care: An in-depth analysis of key populations from the Fast-Track Cities Quality of Care survey in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Background: Key populations experience disproportionate HIV burdens and structural barriers to care. Objective: To compare healthcare utilisation, HIV knowledge and barriers between key population groups (KPG) and non-key populations living with HIV in eThekwini, South Africa. Methods: tests and multivariable logistic regression for partner notification. Results: Of 517 analysed participants, 128 (24.8%) were KPG. KPG participants were younger, more recently diagnosed (< 1 year: 9.4% vs 1.3%) and more often on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for 1-4 years (52.3% vs 33.4%), with similar daily adherence (~83%). KPG were more likely to access care via non-governmental organisations (NGOs; 23.4% vs 5.7%). Controls more often understood undetectable viral load (36.0% vs 21.9%) and that treatment benefits outweigh side effects (65.3% vs 42.9%). KPG more frequently reported undetectable viral load (55.5% vs 29.8%), more frequent screening for co-morbid conditions, and transport-cost barriers (15.6% vs 8.2%). In KPG, NGO care was associated with partner notification (adjusted odds ratio 18.06; 95% confidence interval 4.77-68.41). Conclusion: There are marked differences between KPG and adults with HIV in healthcare utilisation, HIV knowledge and structural barriers.
Authors
- Nceba Gqaleni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1946-3120)
- Nombulelo Magula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-9539)
- S Pillay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-645X)
- Deepak Singh
- Zuniga M. Jose (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-8117)
Institutions
- Durban University of Technology (ZA)
- Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (US)
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine
- Published
- 2026-04-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v27i1.1802
- Primary Topic
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00