Friend, Not Foe: Lowered Tissue Reactivity to Long‐Term Polyimide Implants

One of the biggest challenges for neurotechnology is the design of devices that are tolerated well by brain tissue, without sacrificing functionality and implantability. This study examined which design choices mitigate tissue damage and improve longevity by varying probe features implanted in the cerebral cortex of mice. We report on a systematic, quantitative analysis of neuronal and inflammation markers across cortical depth. We implanted a total of 103 stiff silicon or flexible polyimide probes in 32 mice, varying their thicknesses and widths, and either attaching them to the skull or not. A new, automated workflow to quantify immunohistochemical data examines: 1) the tissue loss caused by the implant, 2) the cortical neuronal density, and 3) the immune response expressed by astrocytic and microglial reaction. Flexible polyimide probes exhibited a clear advantage, causing fewer lesions and weaker immune responses than stiff silicon probes. Furthermore, we observed a weak influence of the shank cross-section. A cortical depth profile of immune reactivity revealed focal reactions at the device entry points in the superficial cortex and at the cortex-white matter boundary. This study gives important insights on optimizing device design parameters as well as surgical insights for improved tissue integration of intracortical electrode arrays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Science
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202600028
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Friend, Not Foe: Lowered Tissue Reactivity to Long‐Term Polyimide Implants

Arno Aarts, Corinne Orlemann, Pieter R. Roelfsema, Tobias Holzhammer et al.
Advanced Science
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
article

Friend, Not Foe: Lowered Tissue Reactivity to Long‐Term Polyimide Implants

Arno Aarts, Corinne Orlemann, Pieter R. Roelfsema, Tobias Holzhammer, Patrick Ruther, Paul Neering, Roxana N. Kooijmans, Maria Asplund, Christian Boehler, Laura De Santis, Rik J. J. van Daal, Kirti Sharma
article en

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges for neurotechnology is the design of devices that are tolerated well by brain tissue, without sacrificing functionality and implantability. This study examined which design choices mitigate tissue damage and improve longevity by varying probe features implanted in the cerebral cortex of mice. We report on a systematic, quantitative analysis of neuronal and inflammation markers across cortical depth. We implanted a total of 103 stiff silicon or flexible polyimide probes in 32 mice, varying their thicknesses and widths, and either attaching them to the skull or not. A new, automated workflow to quantify immunohistochemical data examines: 1) the tissue loss caused by the implant, 2) the cortical neuronal density, and 3) the immune response expressed by astrocytic and microglial reaction. Flexible polyimide probes exhibited a clear advantage, causing fewer lesions and weaker immune responses than stiff silicon probes. Furthermore, we observed a weak influence of the shank cross-section. A cortical depth profile of immune reactivity revealed focal reactions at the device entry points in the superficial cortex and at the cortex-white matter boundary. This study gives important insights on optimizing device design parameters as well as surgical insights for improved tissue integration of intracortical electrode arrays.

Advanced Science
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), Institut de la Vision (FR), University of Freiburg (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), Sorbonne Université (FR), Nanosc (Sweden) (SE), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Freiburg (DE), ATLAS Neuroengineering (Belgium) (BE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.