Using instant messaging applications for consultations in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how consultants and consultees use Instant Messaging Applications (IMAs) during Emergency Department (ED) consultations, examining their attitudes toward these tools and assessing perceptions of existing consultation methods and the perceived need for system improvements. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians involved in Emergency Department consultations at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Lebanon. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing their demographics, consultation patterns, IMAs usage, and opinions on consultation modalities. The recruitment period was from 13/11/2023-08/11/2024. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants were included (65 consultants, 55 consultees). Consultants were significantly older than consultees (28.7 ± 3.4 vs. 26.6 ± 1.91 years, p < 0.001). While all consultees were residents, 64.6% of consultants were residents and 35.4% were fellows (p < 0.001). All participants reported using smartphones when on call (100%). IMAs were the most preferred consultation method overall (48.3%), followed by smartphone calls (32.5%). Consultants favored smartphone calls significantly more than consultees (49.2% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), whereas consultees preferred workstation phone calls (30.9% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). WhatsApp was the dominant IMA used (98.9%). During night shifts, consultants demonstrated a significantly greater reliance on smartphone calls than consultees (84.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.008). IMAs were among the most frequently used methods during both day and night calls (80% vs. 65.2%), and two-thirds of participants (63.7%) reported concerns regarding legal implications and the need for improved consultation tools. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need for structured and secure digital solutions to optimize communication between healthcare teams. With IMAs increasingly embedded in ED consultations, future work should focus on developing dedicated and potentially AI-supported platforms that enhance efficiency, documentation, and data security in clinical communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347028
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using instant messaging applications for consultations in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey

Maha Makki, Afif Mufarrij, Souraya Arabi, Hind Anan et al.
PLoS ONE
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Using instant messaging applications for consultations in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey

Maha Makki, Afif Mufarrij, Souraya Arabi, Hind Anan, Hussein Hijazi, Hani Tamim, Jean-Marie Al Semaani, Sarah S. Abdul-Nabi
article en

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how consultants and consultees use Instant Messaging Applications (IMAs) during Emergency Department (ED) consultations, examining their attitudes toward these tools and assessing perceptions of existing consultation methods and the perceived need for system improvements. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians involved in Emergency Department consultations at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, Lebanon. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing their demographics, consultation patterns, IMAs usage, and opinions on consultation modalities. The recruitment period was from 13/11/2023-08/11/2024. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants were included (65 consultants, 55 consultees). Consultants were significantly older than consultees (28.7 ± 3.4 vs. 26.6 ± 1.91 years, p < 0.001). While all consultees were residents, 64.6% of consultants were residents and 35.4% were fellows (p < 0.001). All participants reported using smartphones when on call (100%). IMAs were the most preferred consultation method overall (48.3%), followed by smartphone calls (32.5%). Consultants favored smartphone calls significantly more than consultees (49.2% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), whereas consultees preferred workstation phone calls (30.9% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). WhatsApp was the dominant IMA used (98.9%). During night shifts, consultants demonstrated a significantly greater reliance on smartphone calls than consultees (84.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.008). IMAs were among the most frequently used methods during both day and night calls (80% vs. 65.2%), and two-thirds of participants (63.7%) reported concerns regarding legal implications and the need for improved consultation tools. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need for structured and secure digital solutions to optimize communication between healthcare teams. With IMAs increasingly embedded in ED consultations, future work should focus on developing dedicated and potentially AI-supported platforms that enhance efficiency, documentation, and data security in clinical communication.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Alfaisal University (SA), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.