Expanding the integration of natural and social sciences in marine affairs and policy

Researchers working in the practical field of marine affairs and policy employ scientific approaches to help resolve problems arising out of human uses of the oceans. Research in this field enables informed decision-making about promoting the sustainable use of the ocean and its associated coastal resources, while encouraging the further integration of analytical approaches from both the natural and social sciences. This focus is essential for characterizing trade-offs like those envisioned in Elkington’s triple-bottom-line framework (environmental quality, social justice, economic prosperity) used to identify and choose policies for achieving sustainability. We argue that integrated assessment models should be improved as means for evaluating the expected benefits and risks of human reliance upon and use of the oceans over long horizons and broad geographic regions. Two of the most pressing issues in this field where such integration could make substantial gains include: understanding how the adverse effects of climate change on the ocean can be mitigated and conceptualizing how the ocean moderates global climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1797599
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding the integration of natural and social sciences in marine affairs and policy

Porter Hoagland, Di Jin
Frontiers in Marine Science
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Expanding the integration of natural and social sciences in marine affairs and policy

Porter Hoagland, Di Jin
article en

Abstract

Researchers working in the practical field of marine affairs and policy employ scientific approaches to help resolve problems arising out of human uses of the oceans. Research in this field enables informed decision-making about promoting the sustainable use of the ocean and its associated coastal resources, while encouraging the further integration of analytical approaches from both the natural and social sciences. This focus is essential for characterizing trade-offs like those envisioned in Elkington’s triple-bottom-line framework (environmental quality, social justice, economic prosperity) used to identify and choose policies for achieving sustainability. We argue that integrated assessment models should be improved as means for evaluating the expected benefits and risks of human reliance upon and use of the oceans over long horizons and broad geographic regions. Two of the most pressing issues in this field where such integration could make substantial gains include: understanding how the adverse effects of climate change on the ocean can be mitigated and conceptualizing how the ocean moderates global climate change.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 13
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.