Beyond the Individual: A 25-year Systematic Review of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model in Longitudinal Dyadic Research Across Disciplines and Contexts

The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) has become a foundational framework for analyzing dyadic data, but systematic reviews synthesizing how longitudinal APIM has been applied across disciplines and populations are limited. This systematic review examined 73 longitudinal APIM studies published between 2008 and 2025, analyzing methodological practices, analytical strategies, and population diversity. Studies were included if they used APIM as the primary framework, reported both actor and partner effects, included a minimum of 70 dyads, and employed longitudinal designs exceeding one year. Data were extracted on study characteristics, sample demographics, APIM variants, statistical approaches, and methodological transparency indicators. Results revealed a fivefold increase in publications after 2016, with applications spanning psychology (37.0%), family science (31.5%), and gerontology (12.3%). However, substantial gaps emerged in three areas. First, geographic and population concentration was evident: 58.9% of studies originated from North America, 86.3% examined couple dyads, and 75.3% utilized secondary data from established panels. Second, methodological transparency showed inconsistency: only 17.8% reported power analyses, 24.7% did not report missing data strategies, and 35.6% failed to document model constraints. Third, universal self-report reliance with minimal multi-method assessment (16.4%) limits distinguishing genuine interpersonal influence from shared method variance. Despite these gaps, nearly all studies were hypothesis-driven, typically articulating a priori expectations regarding actor and partner pathways, and researchers increasingly acknowledged limitations regarding power (37.0%) and self-report reliance (65.8%). Future advances require integrating a priori power analysis using dyadic-specific tools, employing multi-method designs, diversifying populations beyond Western heterosexual couples, and enhancing reporting transparency through preregistration and comprehensive model specification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075261443593
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Individual: A 25-year Systematic Review of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model in Longitudinal Dyadic Research Across Disciplines and Contexts

Rahimah Ibrahim, Hui Foh Foong, Fereshteh Mohammadzadeh Yazd, Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Beyond the Individual: A 25-year Systematic Review of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model in Longitudinal Dyadic Research Across Disciplines and Contexts

Rahimah Ibrahim, Hui Foh Foong, Fereshteh Mohammadzadeh Yazd, Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran
article en

Abstract

The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) has become a foundational framework for analyzing dyadic data, but systematic reviews synthesizing how longitudinal APIM has been applied across disciplines and populations are limited. This systematic review examined 73 longitudinal APIM studies published between 2008 and 2025, analyzing methodological practices, analytical strategies, and population diversity. Studies were included if they used APIM as the primary framework, reported both actor and partner effects, included a minimum of 70 dyads, and employed longitudinal designs exceeding one year. Data were extracted on study characteristics, sample demographics, APIM variants, statistical approaches, and methodological transparency indicators. Results revealed a fivefold increase in publications after 2016, with applications spanning psychology (37.0%), family science (31.5%), and gerontology (12.3%). However, substantial gaps emerged in three areas. First, geographic and population concentration was evident: 58.9% of studies originated from North America, 86.3% examined couple dyads, and 75.3% utilized secondary data from established panels. Second, methodological transparency showed inconsistency: only 17.8% reported power analyses, 24.7% did not report missing data strategies, and 35.6% failed to document model constraints. Third, universal self-report reliance with minimal multi-method assessment (16.4%) limits distinguishing genuine interpersonal influence from shared method variance. Despite these gaps, nearly all studies were hypothesis-driven, typically articulating a priori expectations regarding actor and partner pathways, and researchers increasingly acknowledged limitations regarding power (37.0%) and self-report reliance (65.8%). Future advances require integrating a priori power analysis using dyadic-specific tools, employing multi-method designs, diversifying populations beyond Western heterosexual couples, and enhancing reporting transparency through preregistration and comprehensive model specification.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.