Basic Education Research Program (BERP) Meets Artificial Intelligence: A CIPP Evaluation into Research Innovation Among Master Teachers

Abstract. This study evaluates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the Basic Education Research Program (BERP) using Stufflebeam’s Context–Input–Process–Product (CIPP) evaluation model. It examines how the program strengthens research innovation, productivity, and capacity development among Master Teachers in selected public schools in the Schools Division of Baybay City, Philippines. Anchored on the growing relevance of AI in academic research, the study assesses program effectiveness in terms of contextual alignment, resource adequacy, implementation processes, and outcomes. A mixed-methods design was employed involving 50 Master Teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using validated survey questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, AI usage logs, and document analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis to identify patterns in AI utilization, research engagement, and institutional support. Findings show strong contextual alignment between BERP and institutional goals (M = 4.32), indicating high awareness and support for AI integration. Input evaluation revealed adequate institutional support (M = 4.09), including access to AI tools, training, and mentorship, although limited research time emerged as a constraint (M = 3.88). Process evaluation (M = 4.11) indicated structured and ethical implementation, but highlighted the need for stronger coaching and feedback mechanisms. Product evaluation (M = 4.15) showed that AI integration improved research quality, efficiency, and teacher engagement, contributing to enhanced digital literacy and instructional innovation. However, only 38% of respondents actively used AI tools in research writing, indicating low adoption despite availability. The study concludes that BERP has strong potential as an AI-supported research development program, but sustainability depends on improving AI literacy, mentorship, workload allocation, and ethical capacity-building to maximize institutional impact. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Basic Education Research Program, CIPP Evaluation, Mixed Methods, Educational Research Innovation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19593334
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basic Education Research Program (BERP) Meets Artificial Intelligence: A CIPP Evaluation into Research Innovation Among Master Teachers

Bernadeth L. Fernandez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

Basic Education Research Program (BERP) Meets Artificial Intelligence: A CIPP Evaluation into Research Innovation Among Master Teachers

Bernadeth L. Fernandez
article en

Abstract

Abstract. This study evaluates the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the Basic Education Research Program (BERP) using Stufflebeam’s Context–Input–Process–Product (CIPP) evaluation model. It examines how the program strengthens research innovation, productivity, and capacity development among Master Teachers in selected public schools in the Schools Division of Baybay City, Philippines. Anchored on the growing relevance of AI in academic research, the study assesses program effectiveness in terms of contextual alignment, resource adequacy, implementation processes, and outcomes. A mixed-methods design was employed involving 50 Master Teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using validated survey questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, AI usage logs, and document analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis to identify patterns in AI utilization, research engagement, and institutional support. Findings show strong contextual alignment between BERP and institutional goals (M = 4.32), indicating high awareness and support for AI integration. Input evaluation revealed adequate institutional support (M = 4.09), including access to AI tools, training, and mentorship, although limited research time emerged as a constraint (M = 3.88). Process evaluation (M = 4.11) indicated structured and ethical implementation, but highlighted the need for stronger coaching and feedback mechanisms. Product evaluation (M = 4.15) showed that AI integration improved research quality, efficiency, and teacher engagement, contributing to enhanced digital literacy and instructional innovation. However, only 38% of respondents actively used AI tools in research writing, indicating low adoption despite availability. The study concludes that BERP has strong potential as an AI-supported research development program, but sustainability depends on improving AI literacy, mentorship, workload allocation, and ethical capacity-building to maximize institutional impact. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Basic Education Research Program, CIPP Evaluation, Mixed Methods, Educational Research Innovation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Visayas State University (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.