The Stellar Mass Function for Nine Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Local Universe

Abstract We measure galaxy stellar mass functions (SMFs) for nine of the most massive galaxy clusters in the local Universe (0.07 &lt; z &lt; 0.11) using deep and complete spectroscopy from the MAssive Cluster Survey with Hectospec (MACH). We construct the cluster SMFs down to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> . For comparison, we measure the SMF for field galaxies, complete to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> , based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectroscopy over the same redshift range. The mean MACH SMF shows a shape similar to that of the field SMF but with a significantly higher amplitude at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> . At <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> , the MACH SMF shows a clear excess, indicating the contribution of massive galaxies, including brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). Based on homogeneous MACH spectroscopy, we compare SMF shapes for quiescent and star-forming members as a function of the cluster-centric distance. The quiescent SMFs display a curved shape with a peak at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> ; the star-forming SMFs decline monotonically with increasing stellar mass. We further compare the mean MACH SMF with SMFs derived from similarly massive clusters in the IllustrisTNG-300 simulations. The shape of the observed and simulated SMFs agrees well overall. However, the MACH clusters contain roughly a factor of 2 more galaxies at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>9.0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> . These results demonstrate that constructing cluster SMFs from complete spectroscopic samples can test simulations and provide powerful constraints on galaxy formation and evolution in dense environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae4c60
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Stellar Mass Function for Nine Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Local Universe

Jubee Sohn, Antonaldo Diaferio, Margaret J. Geller, Jong-In Park et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

The Stellar Mass Function for Nine Massive Galaxy Clusters in the Local Universe

Jubee Sohn, Antonaldo Diaferio, Margaret J. Geller, Jong-In Park, Ken J. Rines
article en

Abstract

Abstract We measure galaxy stellar mass functions (SMFs) for nine of the most massive galaxy clusters in the local Universe (0.07 &lt; z &lt; 0.11) using deep and complete spectroscopy from the MAssive Cluster Survey with Hectospec (MACH). We construct the cluster SMFs down to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> . For comparison, we measure the SMF for field galaxies, complete to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≳</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> , based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectroscopy over the same redshift range. The mean MACH SMF shows a shape similar to that of the field SMF but with a significantly higher amplitude at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> . At <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn> </mml:math> , the MACH SMF shows a clear excess, indicating the contribution of massive galaxies, including brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs). Based on homogeneous MACH spectroscopy, we compare SMF shapes for quiescent and star-forming members as a function of the cluster-centric distance. The quiescent SMFs display a curved shape with a peak at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> ; the star-forming SMFs decline monotonically with increasing stellar mass. We further compare the mean MACH SMF with SMFs derived from similarly massive clusters in the IllustrisTNG-300 simulations. The shape of the observed and simulated SMFs agrees well overall. However, the MACH clusters contain roughly a factor of 2 more galaxies at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>9.0</mml:mn> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>log</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10.5</mml:mn> </mml:math> . These results demonstrate that constructing cluster SMFs from complete spectroscopic samples can test simulations and provide powerful constraints on galaxy formation and evolution in dense environments.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 1001(2)
Seoul National University, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.