The effects of gamified AI-supported digital learning environments on personalized learning and student engagement in school education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Gamified, AI-enabled digital learning environments (GAI-DLEs), integrating adaptive or generative AI with game-based design, are increasingly used in school science education to support personalized learning. However, consolidated evidence on their effectiveness, implementation models, and regional distribution remains limited, particularly in Central Asia. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus and complementary databases identified peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 1,284 records were identified. After deduplication, 962 unique records were screened at the title and abstract level, and 150 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 81 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. The included evidence was examined through trend analysis, thematic synthesis, and geographic mapping. The meta-analysis included experimental and quasi-experimental studies from formal school settings. Standardized mean differences were estimated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses by education level, AI technology type, publication period, study quality, and region. Results GAI-DLEs demonstrated a significant positive effect on science learning outcomes compared with non-AI instructional conditions (SMD = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.69–1.33; p < 0.001). Effects were stronger in secondary education (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.69–1.55) than in primary education (SMD = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.35–1.25). Studies employing adaptive or generative AI systems tended to report larger effect sizes. Evidence regarding student engagement was generally positive but showed substantial contextual heterogeneity. Conclusion GAI-DLEs show consistent potential to improve science learning in school contexts. However, the global evidence base remains geographically imbalanced, with Central Asia substantially underrepresented. Future research should adopt theory-driven and longitudinal designs to examine how specific combinations of AI functionalities, gamification mechanics, and classroom integration strategies produce scalable educational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1754080
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of gamified AI-supported digital learning environments on personalized learning and student engagement in school education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Indira Usembayeva, Dinara Kadirkhankyzy Berdi, Gulzhan Zholaushievna Niyazova, Aknur Amangeldiyevna Mindetbayeva et al.
Frontiers in Education
Educational Games and Gamification
article

The effects of gamified AI-supported digital learning environments on personalized learning and student engagement in school education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Indira Usembayeva, Dinara Kadirkhankyzy Berdi, Gulzhan Zholaushievna Niyazova, Aknur Amangeldiyevna Mindetbayeva, Balzhan Meirbekkyzy Duisekeyeva
article en

Abstract

Background Gamified, AI-enabled digital learning environments (GAI-DLEs), integrating adaptive or generative AI with game-based design, are increasingly used in school science education to support personalized learning. However, consolidated evidence on their effectiveness, implementation models, and regional distribution remains limited, particularly in Central Asia. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of Scopus and complementary databases identified peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 1,284 records were identified. After deduplication, 962 unique records were screened at the title and abstract level, and 150 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 81 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. The included evidence was examined through trend analysis, thematic synthesis, and geographic mapping. The meta-analysis included experimental and quasi-experimental studies from formal school settings. Standardized mean differences were estimated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses by education level, AI technology type, publication period, study quality, and region. Results GAI-DLEs demonstrated a significant positive effect on science learning outcomes compared with non-AI instructional conditions (SMD = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.69–1.33; p < 0.001). Effects were stronger in secondary education (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.69–1.55) than in primary education (SMD = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.35–1.25). Studies employing adaptive or generative AI systems tended to report larger effect sizes. Evidence regarding student engagement was generally positive but showed substantial contextual heterogeneity. Conclusion GAI-DLEs show consistent potential to improve science learning in school contexts. However, the global evidence base remains geographically imbalanced, with Central Asia substantially underrepresented. Future research should adopt theory-driven and longitudinal designs to examine how specific combinations of AI functionalities, gamification mechanics, and classroom integration strategies produce scalable educational outcomes.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Ahmet Yesevi University (KZ), Children's Specialized Hospital (US)
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.