Sex Differences in Underachievement and Social-Emotional Functioning of Gifted Students

This study examined sex differences among academically achieving and underachieving gifted students ( N = 280) in the Netherlands attending a pre-university track in secondary school. We focused on three types of underachievement: general, language arts, and STEM. Boys demonstrated higher general intelligence scores than girls, while girls showed higher general academic achievement than boys. No sex differences were found in language arts and STEM achievement. Furthermore, boys underachieved at higher rates than girls across all three achievement domains (general, language arts, and STEM). Students who underachieve in one domain are more likely to underachieve in another. Regarding social-emotional characteristics, the study identified differences between achievers and underachievers in academic-achievement motivation and social-emotional well-being, but not in academic self-concept and inquisitiveness. Our findings highlight the importance of early identification of underachievement in gifted students across multiple domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gifted Child Quarterly
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862261430325
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Underachievement and Social-Emotional Functioning of Gifted Students

Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Ophélie Allyssa Desmet, Mariska Poelman, Tammy J. Byrd
Gifted Child Quarterly
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Sex Differences in Underachievement and Social-Emotional Functioning of Gifted Students

Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Ophélie Allyssa Desmet, Mariska Poelman, Tammy J. Byrd
article en

Abstract

This study examined sex differences among academically achieving and underachieving gifted students ( N = 280) in the Netherlands attending a pre-university track in secondary school. We focused on three types of underachievement: general, language arts, and STEM. Boys demonstrated higher general intelligence scores than girls, while girls showed higher general academic achievement than boys. No sex differences were found in language arts and STEM achievement. Furthermore, boys underachieved at higher rates than girls across all three achievement domains (general, language arts, and STEM). Students who underachieve in one domain are more likely to underachieve in another. Regarding social-emotional characteristics, the study identified differences between achievers and underachievers in academic-achievement motivation and social-emotional well-being, but not in academic self-concept and inquisitiveness. Our findings highlight the importance of early identification of underachievement in gifted students across multiple domains.

Gifted Child Quarterly
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Ball State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sex Differences in Underachievement and Social-Emotional Functioning of Gifted Students — Marjolijn van Weerdenburg, Ophélie Allyssa Desmet, et al. · Gifted Child Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS