Preparing for shotgun sequencing in forensic genetics – Benchmarking of tools for read mapping, genotype calling, and imputation

Shotgun sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool in forensic genetics, as it allows for comprehensive genetic profiles to be generated from highly degraded DNA. The method enables simultaneous access to a wide range of markers, thereby supporting applications such as human identification (HID), DNA intelligence, and forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG). However, the accuracy and utility of shotgun sequencing data are highly dependent on the bioinformatic analysis. In this study, we benchmarked widely used bioinformatic tools using shotgun sequencing data from both high-quality (blood and buccal) and low-quality (hair) forensic samples. Specifically, we evaluated five alignment algorithms (Bowtie2, BWA-ALN, BWA-MEM, CLC, and CLC LightSpeed), four genotype calling methods (ANGSD, ATLAS, GATK HaplotypeCaller, and a custom rule-based approach), and three imputation methods (Beagle4.1, Beagle5.4, and GLIMPSE2). All investigated tools were found to be suitable for analysing high-quality reference samples. However, their performance varied significantly when applied to low-quality (hair) forensic samples. The combination of BWA-MEM, ANGSD, or GATK HaplotypeCaller, and imputation with GLIMPSE2 produced the lowest degree of discordance. The work presented here emphasises the importance of informed bioinformatic tool selection and optimisation, and it provides practical recommendations for analysing shotgun sequencing data in forensic genetics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Genetics
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2026.103505
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing for shotgun sequencing in forensic genetics – Benchmarking of tools for read mapping, genotype calling, and imputation

Andreas Tillmar, Brando Poggiali, Marie‐Louise Kampmann, Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen et al.
Forensic Science International Genetics
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

Preparing for shotgun sequencing in forensic genetics – Benchmarking of tools for read mapping, genotype calling, and imputation

Andreas Tillmar, Brando Poggiali, Marie‐Louise Kampmann, Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen, Alberte Honoré Jepsen, Elena I. Zavala, Martin Tuwel Jensen, Claus Børsting, Daniel Kling
article en

Abstract

Shotgun sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool in forensic genetics, as it allows for comprehensive genetic profiles to be generated from highly degraded DNA. The method enables simultaneous access to a wide range of markers, thereby supporting applications such as human identification (HID), DNA intelligence, and forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG). However, the accuracy and utility of shotgun sequencing data are highly dependent on the bioinformatic analysis. In this study, we benchmarked widely used bioinformatic tools using shotgun sequencing data from both high-quality (blood and buccal) and low-quality (hair) forensic samples. Specifically, we evaluated five alignment algorithms (Bowtie2, BWA-ALN, BWA-MEM, CLC, and CLC LightSpeed), four genotype calling methods (ANGSD, ATLAS, GATK HaplotypeCaller, and a custom rule-based approach), and three imputation methods (Beagle4.1, Beagle5.4, and GLIMPSE2). All investigated tools were found to be suitable for analysing high-quality reference samples. However, their performance varied significantly when applied to low-quality (hair) forensic samples. The combination of BWA-MEM, ANGSD, or GATK HaplotypeCaller, and imputation with GLIMPSE2 produced the lowest degree of discordance. The work presented here emphasises the importance of informed bioinformatic tool selection and optimisation, and it provides practical recommendations for analysing shotgun sequencing data in forensic genetics.

Forensic Science International GeneticsVol. 84
University of Copenhagen (DK), Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine (SE), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.