Adapting the EC Model to the Frequency Dependency of Binaural Masking Level Differences – Is this Relevant for Speech in Noise?

Several binaural speech intelligibility models simulate human binaural processing using the Equalization-Cancellation (EC) mechanism, incorporating processing inaccuracies based on tone-in-noise detection at 500~Hz. Despite this, such inaccuracies are typically assumed to be frequency-independent in binaural speech intelligibility models. This study examines the validity of that assumption and explores how auditory filter bandwidth affects binaural masking release. Experiment I measured tone detection thresholds across frequencies from 250 to 2000~Hz in 12 normal-hearing and 5 hearing-impaired listeners, varying the interaural phase difference (IPD) of noise between 0 and 5$\pi$. Results were compared with EC model predictions. Binaural inaccuracies showed a low-pass effect, reducing binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) at higher frequencies. However, the EC model inaccurately predicted BMLDs at 250~Hz. Experiment II involved a subset of listeners performing speech-in-noise intelligibility tasks with low-pass filtered speech. This allowed assessment of whether tone-in-noise detection could predict speech recognition thresholds (SRTs), particularly in hearing-impaired individuals whose low-frequency hearing remained near normal. Findings revealed that adapting the model’s binaural inaccuracies improved SRT predictions beyond audiometric thresholds alone.on at 500 Hz. Despite this, such inaccuracies are typically assumed to be frequency-independent in

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026038/pdf
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting the EC Model to the Frequency Dependency of Binaural Masking Level Differences – Is this Relevant for Speech in Noise?

Christopher Fabian Hauth, Thomas Brand
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Adapting the EC Model to the Frequency Dependency of Binaural Masking Level Differences – Is this Relevant for Speech in Noise?

Christopher Fabian Hauth, Thomas Brand
article en

Abstract

Several binaural speech intelligibility models simulate human binaural processing using the Equalization-Cancellation (EC) mechanism, incorporating processing inaccuracies based on tone-in-noise detection at 500~Hz. Despite this, such inaccuracies are typically assumed to be frequency-independent in binaural speech intelligibility models. This study examines the validity of that assumption and explores how auditory filter bandwidth affects binaural masking release. Experiment I measured tone detection thresholds across frequencies from 250 to 2000~Hz in 12 normal-hearing and 5 hearing-impaired listeners, varying the interaural phase difference (IPD) of noise between 0 and 5$\pi$. Results were compared with EC model predictions. Binaural inaccuracies showed a low-pass effect, reducing binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) at higher frequencies. However, the EC model inaccurately predicted BMLDs at 250~Hz. Experiment II involved a subset of listeners performing speech-in-noise intelligibility tasks with low-pass filtered speech. This allowed assessment of whether tone-in-noise detection could predict speech recognition thresholds (SRTs), particularly in hearing-impaired individuals whose low-frequency hearing remained near normal. Findings revealed that adapting the model’s binaural inaccuracies improved SRT predictions beyond audiometric thresholds alone.on at 500 Hz. Despite this, such inaccuracies are typically assumed to be frequency-independent in

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adapting the EC Model to the Frequency Dependency of Binaural Masking Level Differences – Is this Relevant for Speech in Noise? — Christopher Fabian Hauth, Thomas Brand · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS