Multi-scale UAV, flux-chamber, and point-source measurement framework for facility-wide greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions assessment from wastewater treatment operations

This study presents a facility-wide assessment of greenhouse gas (CH₄, N₂O, CO₂) and air-pollutant (NH₃, H₂S, NMVOC) emissions from a tertiary municipal wastewater treatment plant in northern California. Emissions were quantified using complementary unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV) flux-curtain, dynamic flux-chamber, and source-testing approaches across four campaigns. The UAV method provided spatially integrated, top-down CH₄ fluxes, while chambers and source tests captured spatiotemporal variability of multiple gases from individual processes. The highest UAV flux (26.4 ± 6.3 kg CH₄ h⁻¹) in the first campaign coincided with a fugitive digester leak detected and later repaired, demonstrating UAV sensitivity to large, transient CH₄ releases. Across the remaining campaigns, mean UAV-derived facility-wide emissions were 1.44 kg CH₄ h⁻¹, approximately 90 % lower than the ∼13.3 kg CH₄ h⁻¹ mean facility-wide emissions estimated from summed flux chamber and point-source measurements. Total operational-carbon emissions, integrating direct and indirect forcing contributions, were 12,000 ± 500 Mg CO₂-eq yr⁻¹ (1.80 ± 0.07 kg CO₂-eq m⁻³ wastewater). The candlestick flare and biosolids drying operations accounted for 86 % and 14 % of total CH₄ emissions, while secondary treatment dominated CO₂, NH₃, and N₂O generation. Emission variability was governed primarily by unit process, followed by time of year (e.g., wet or dry season) and time of day, with higher fluxes during dry-season daytime conditions. The integrated UAV, chamber, and source testing framework established herein provides a novel, multi-scale approach for quantifying and mitigating facility-wide GHG and air-pollutant emissions. The methodology and mechanistic insights are transferable to wastewater utilities globally, supporting data-driven, low-carbon treatment design and operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125950
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-scale UAV, flux-chamber, and point-source measurement framework for facility-wide greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions assessment from wastewater treatment operations

Derek C. Manheim, Madjid Delkash, Sajjad Karimi, Paul Imhoff et al.
Water Research
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Multi-scale UAV, flux-chamber, and point-source measurement framework for facility-wide greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions assessment from wastewater treatment operations

Derek C. Manheim, Madjid Delkash, Sajjad Karimi, Paul Imhoff, Ramin Yazdani
article en

Abstract

This study presents a facility-wide assessment of greenhouse gas (CH₄, N₂O, CO₂) and air-pollutant (NH₃, H₂S, NMVOC) emissions from a tertiary municipal wastewater treatment plant in northern California. Emissions were quantified using complementary unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV) flux-curtain, dynamic flux-chamber, and source-testing approaches across four campaigns. The UAV method provided spatially integrated, top-down CH₄ fluxes, while chambers and source tests captured spatiotemporal variability of multiple gases from individual processes. The highest UAV flux (26.4 ± 6.3 kg CH₄ h⁻¹) in the first campaign coincided with a fugitive digester leak detected and later repaired, demonstrating UAV sensitivity to large, transient CH₄ releases. Across the remaining campaigns, mean UAV-derived facility-wide emissions were 1.44 kg CH₄ h⁻¹, approximately 90 % lower than the ∼13.3 kg CH₄ h⁻¹ mean facility-wide emissions estimated from summed flux chamber and point-source measurements. Total operational-carbon emissions, integrating direct and indirect forcing contributions, were 12,000 ± 500 Mg CO₂-eq yr⁻¹ (1.80 ± 0.07 kg CO₂-eq m⁻³ wastewater). The candlestick flare and biosolids drying operations accounted for 86 % and 14 % of total CH₄ emissions, while secondary treatment dominated CO₂, NH₃, and N₂O generation. Emission variability was governed primarily by unit process, followed by time of year (e.g., wet or dry season) and time of day, with higher fluxes during dry-season daytime conditions. The integrated UAV, chamber, and source testing framework established herein provides a novel, multi-scale approach for quantifying and mitigating facility-wide GHG and air-pollutant emissions. The methodology and mechanistic insights are transferable to wastewater utilities globally, supporting data-driven, low-carbon treatment design and operation.

Water ResearchVol. 300
Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), Quality Research (US), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR), University of California, Davis (US), University of Delaware (US)
California Energy Commission, Electric Power Research Institute
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.