Corporate Sustainability Through an Ideological Lens: How CEO Beliefs in Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Neorealism Affect ESG Goals

ABSTRACT Research Question/Issue This study investigates how CEO ideological orientation shapes corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in European listed firms. Using a text‐based classification of CEO beliefs into liberalism, neoliberalism, and neorealism, the analysis examines how ideology maps onto sustainability outcomes for 637 firms from 2014 to 2022. Research Findings/Insights CEO ideology is systematically associated with ESG performance, but the direction and breadth of engagement differ across ideological profiles. Liberal‐oriented CEOs are positively related to overall ESG performance, with particularly strong associations for social and environmental dimensions, consistent with broader stakeholder‐oriented engagement. Neoliberal‐oriented CEOs exhibit a negative relationship with ESG performance, reflecting an emphasis on market efficiency, shareholder primacy, and economically “instrumental” sustainability initiatives that are pursued mainly when they generate direct financial benefits. Neorealist‐oriented CEOs show a more selective pattern, with positive associations concentrated in governance‐related practices linked to control, risk management, and organizational stability, whereas environmental and social initiatives are comparatively deprioritized unless aligned with core strategic objectives. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study extends upper echelons theory and stakeholder theory by illustrating how CEO ideology operates as both a cognitive filter and a stakeholder prioritization mechanism, shaping ESG outcomes. It explains how leaders' belief systems influence which stakeholder groups and sustainability dimensions receive emphasis, deepening understanding of executive heterogeneity in corporate sustainability. Methodologically, the use of natural language processing to quantify CEO ideology provides a novel, data‐driven approach that strengthens future research on leadership values and strategic decision‐making. Practitioner/Policy Implications For stakeholders, including investors and board members, understanding the CEO's ideological orientation provides critical insights into expected ESG commitment levels. This knowledge enhances leadership assessment, aiding in alignment with organizational sustainability goals and long‐term corporate responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance An International Review
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.70037
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Sustainability Through an Ideological Lens: How CEO Beliefs in Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Neorealism Affect ESG Goals

Hamzeh Al Amosh
Corporate Governance An International Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate Sustainability Through an Ideological Lens: How CEO Beliefs in Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Neorealism Affect ESG Goals

Hamzeh Al Amosh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research Question/Issue This study investigates how CEO ideological orientation shapes corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in European listed firms. Using a text‐based classification of CEO beliefs into liberalism, neoliberalism, and neorealism, the analysis examines how ideology maps onto sustainability outcomes for 637 firms from 2014 to 2022. Research Findings/Insights CEO ideology is systematically associated with ESG performance, but the direction and breadth of engagement differ across ideological profiles. Liberal‐oriented CEOs are positively related to overall ESG performance, with particularly strong associations for social and environmental dimensions, consistent with broader stakeholder‐oriented engagement. Neoliberal‐oriented CEOs exhibit a negative relationship with ESG performance, reflecting an emphasis on market efficiency, shareholder primacy, and economically “instrumental” sustainability initiatives that are pursued mainly when they generate direct financial benefits. Neorealist‐oriented CEOs show a more selective pattern, with positive associations concentrated in governance‐related practices linked to control, risk management, and organizational stability, whereas environmental and social initiatives are comparatively deprioritized unless aligned with core strategic objectives. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study extends upper echelons theory and stakeholder theory by illustrating how CEO ideology operates as both a cognitive filter and a stakeholder prioritization mechanism, shaping ESG outcomes. It explains how leaders' belief systems influence which stakeholder groups and sustainability dimensions receive emphasis, deepening understanding of executive heterogeneity in corporate sustainability. Methodologically, the use of natural language processing to quantify CEO ideology provides a novel, data‐driven approach that strengthens future research on leadership values and strategic decision‐making. Practitioner/Policy Implications For stakeholders, including investors and board members, understanding the CEO's ideological orientation provides critical insights into expected ESG commitment levels. This knowledge enhances leadership assessment, aiding in alignment with organizational sustainability goals and long‐term corporate responsibility.

Corporate Governance An International ReviewVol. 34(3)
University of South Africa (ZA), Jadara University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.