Evaluation of ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek from a Privacy Perspective

The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has revolutionized research, diagnostics, and patient care. In particular, the emergence of ChatGPT and the recent rise of DeepSeek have drawn significant attention to this landscape. This empirical work provides a comparative performance evaluation of these models and their role in medical education from a privacy perspective. Our study shows that, at present, DeepSeek-R1 is based on enhanced reasoning capabilities, while the ChatGPT-4o counterpart, on the other hand, is designed with support for text, audio, and vision which is lacking in standard DeepSeek models. However, due to the distillation techniques used, DeepSeek has an advantage over ChatGPT in terms of resource requirements. We evaluate both models on the MedQA dataset from privacy perspectives where ChatGPT returns 94% correct answers compared to 91% with DeepSeek, though DeepSeek demonstrates consistency in explanatory responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15081644
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek from a Privacy Perspective

Khalid Alissa, Nasro Min‐Allah
Electronics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluation of ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek from a Privacy Perspective

Khalid Alissa, Nasro Min‐Allah
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare has revolutionized research, diagnostics, and patient care. In particular, the emergence of ChatGPT and the recent rise of DeepSeek have drawn significant attention to this landscape. This empirical work provides a comparative performance evaluation of these models and their role in medical education from a privacy perspective. Our study shows that, at present, DeepSeek-R1 is based on enhanced reasoning capabilities, while the ChatGPT-4o counterpart, on the other hand, is designed with support for text, audio, and vision which is lacking in standard DeepSeek models. However, due to the distillation techniques used, DeepSeek has an advantage over ChatGPT in terms of resource requirements. We evaluate both models on the MedQA dataset from privacy perspectives where ChatGPT returns 94% correct answers compared to 91% with DeepSeek, though DeepSeek demonstrates consistency in explanatory responses.

ElectronicsVol. 15(8)
Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.