Clinician perspectives on the clinical utility of Belay Summit™ 2.0 cerebrospinal fluid test – A mixed methods study

Purpose: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Central Nervous System (CNS) Guidelines recommend utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) to enable comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) as standard of care for molecular characterization of CNS malignancies. The restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) makes plasma-based liquid biopsy an ineffective alternative, however cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive alternative for genomic assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the clinician perspective of clinical utility of Belay's CSF-based genomic assay, Summit™ 2.0, and to assess how clinicians use test results in routine clinical practice. Methods: Clinical utility was assessed using clinician-reported survey responses from cases where Summit™ 2.0 testing was ordered for patients with known or suspected CNS disease. Survey questions evaluated indications for testing, test positivity, impact on clinical decision-making, report clarity, and perceived overall utility. Results: The survey response rate was 52% (95 surveys sent). Among 49 surveyed cases, 74% yielded positive genomic findings. Clinicians most frequently ordered testing to address diagnostic uncertainty or inform clinical management, with treatment selection as a less frequent primary indication. Clinical utility was reported in 86% of cases including those with negative findings, of which some results were useful for confirming existing diagnoses or management strategies. Clinicians also reported high confidence in the clarity and usability of test reports. Conclusion: Clinician-reported outcomes indicate that Summit™ 2.0 CSF-based genomic testing influenced clinical decision-making, including treatment selection, diagnostic clarification, confirmation of expected diagnoses, and care planning and provides meaningful information that supports diagnostic evaluation and management of CNS tumors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Liquid Biopsy
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlb.2026.100468
Primary Topic
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinician perspectives on the clinical utility of Belay Summit™ 2.0 cerebrospinal fluid test – A mixed methods study

Chen Hu, Kala F. Schilter, DeElegant Robinson, Vindhya Udhane et al.
The Journal of Liquid Biopsy
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
article

Clinician perspectives on the clinical utility of Belay Summit™ 2.0 cerebrospinal fluid test – A mixed methods study

Chen Hu, Kala F. Schilter, DeElegant Robinson, Vindhya Udhane, Alexandra Larson, Chetan Bettegowda, Honey V. Reddi, Matthias Holdhoff, Qian Nie
article en

Abstract

Purpose: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Central Nervous System (CNS) Guidelines recommend utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) to enable comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) as standard of care for molecular characterization of CNS malignancies. The restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) makes plasma-based liquid biopsy an ineffective alternative, however cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive alternative for genomic assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the clinician perspective of clinical utility of Belay's CSF-based genomic assay, Summit™ 2.0, and to assess how clinicians use test results in routine clinical practice. Methods: Clinical utility was assessed using clinician-reported survey responses from cases where Summit™ 2.0 testing was ordered for patients with known or suspected CNS disease. Survey questions evaluated indications for testing, test positivity, impact on clinical decision-making, report clarity, and perceived overall utility. Results: The survey response rate was 52% (95 surveys sent). Among 49 surveyed cases, 74% yielded positive genomic findings. Clinicians most frequently ordered testing to address diagnostic uncertainty or inform clinical management, with treatment selection as a less frequent primary indication. Clinical utility was reported in 86% of cases including those with negative findings, of which some results were useful for confirming existing diagnoses or management strategies. Clinicians also reported high confidence in the clarity and usability of test reports. Conclusion: Clinician-reported outcomes indicate that Summit™ 2.0 CSF-based genomic testing influenced clinical decision-making, including treatment selection, diagnostic clarification, confirmation of expected diagnoses, and care planning and provides meaningful information that supports diagnostic evaluation and management of CNS tumors.

The Journal of Liquid BiopsyVol. 12
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), CS Diagnostics (DE)
National Institutes of Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.