Immediate Loading After Implant Placement with Relocation of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Atrophic Mandibles: A Four-Year Retrospective Evaluation

Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the survival rate and complications of immediately loaded implant-supported restorations in atrophic mandibles of patients subjected to inferior alveolar nerve relocation for the placement of dental implants. Methods: Consecutively treated patients having a follow-up of four years after loading of implants immediately placed after inferior alveolar nerve repositioning were included. Outcome measures were implant and prothesis survival rates and any type of complications related to the surgery, in particular related to post-operative neurosensory disturbance. Results: Data from 14 consecutive patients rehabilitated with 51 implants were analyzed. All provisional prosthetic restorations could be immediately placed after implant placement, none failed, and no patient dropped out over the four years after definitive loading. Only one implant failed. One day postoperatively, all patients experienced dysesthesia or paresthesia. At two weeks, nine patients had a total neurological recovery and one had partial recovery, while the remaining four patients did not recover. One mandible fractured three weeks after implant placement. At one-year post-loading, one patient was still affected by neurosensory dysfunction and three partially recovered (one of these had it preoperatively). After three years, two patients still presented partial recovery. After four years, no further changes were recorded, and no patients reported total neurosensory dysfunction. The patient with the fractured mandible recovered completely with no neurosensory disturbances. Conclusions: Implant placement in atrophic mandibles following inferior alveolar nerve transposition or lateralization may represent a viable alternative to vertical ridge augmentation, with the added advantage of allowing immediate fixed provisional prothesis. Although severe complications and neurosensory disturbances are not uncommon, all patients experience gradual recovery within one to three years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/oral6020045
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immediate Loading After Implant Placement with Relocation of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Atrophic Mandibles: A Four-Year Retrospective Evaluation

Gian Luca Pancrazi, Marco Esposito, Saverio Cosola, Raffaele Vinci
Oral
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Immediate Loading After Implant Placement with Relocation of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Atrophic Mandibles: A Four-Year Retrospective Evaluation

Gian Luca Pancrazi, Marco Esposito, Saverio Cosola, Raffaele Vinci
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the survival rate and complications of immediately loaded implant-supported restorations in atrophic mandibles of patients subjected to inferior alveolar nerve relocation for the placement of dental implants. Methods: Consecutively treated patients having a follow-up of four years after loading of implants immediately placed after inferior alveolar nerve repositioning were included. Outcome measures were implant and prothesis survival rates and any type of complications related to the surgery, in particular related to post-operative neurosensory disturbance. Results: Data from 14 consecutive patients rehabilitated with 51 implants were analyzed. All provisional prosthetic restorations could be immediately placed after implant placement, none failed, and no patient dropped out over the four years after definitive loading. Only one implant failed. One day postoperatively, all patients experienced dysesthesia or paresthesia. At two weeks, nine patients had a total neurological recovery and one had partial recovery, while the remaining four patients did not recover. One mandible fractured three weeks after implant placement. At one-year post-loading, one patient was still affected by neurosensory dysfunction and three partially recovered (one of these had it preoperatively). After three years, two patients still presented partial recovery. After four years, no further changes were recorded, and no patients reported total neurosensory dysfunction. The patient with the fractured mandible recovered completely with no neurosensory disturbances. Conclusions: Implant placement in atrophic mandibles following inferior alveolar nerve transposition or lateralization may represent a viable alternative to vertical ridge augmentation, with the added advantage of allowing immediate fixed provisional prothesis. Although severe complications and neurosensory disturbances are not uncommon, all patients experience gradual recovery within one to three years.

OralVol. 6(2)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.